// // Create a fake order ID using the current // time and the unique identifier that GA uses to // track this visitor. // var timeObj = new Date; var unixTimeMs = timeObj.getTime(); var unixTime = parseInt(unixTimeMs / 1000); var orderID = pageTracker._visitCode() + '-' + unixTime; // // This function assigns order values depending // on what has been clicked and submits the transaction // function subscriptiontracker(subtype,value) { pageTracker._addTrans( orderID, // Order ID "", // Affiliation value, // Total "", // Tax "", // Shipping "", // City "", // State "" // Country ); pageTracker._addItem( orderID, // Order ID subtype, // SKU subtype, // Product Name "blog", // Category value, // Price "1" // Quantity ); pageTracker._trackTrans(); alert("Test successful"); }

AdWords CTR Test: .co.uk Vs .com

by Kevin Gibbons on March 5, 2007

At the beginning of February I posted about a Google AdWords regionalised ad text experiment I had been carrying out. At the time I had just began monitoring the performance of two very similar ads, the only difference being the TLD (Top Level Domain) of the display URL. The first ad’s URL was www.seoptimise.com, with the second ad using www.seoptimise.co.uk, the destination URL’s were exactly the same.

The campaign was only targeted to the UK and because of this I didn’t expect users to pay too much attention to the TLD and anticipated very similar results from both ad variations.

AdWords CTR Test: .co.uk Vs .com

.com Ad Percentage Increases:
Conversion Rate: 34.75%
CTR: 32.26%
Cost Per Conversion: 25.97%

The screenshot above shows that while there wasn’t a massive difference between the figures for both ads, the .com ad outperforms the .co.uk version in CTR, conversion rate and cost per conversion, showing a £1 saving from each conversion! I found this interesting because the campaign was geo-targeted specifically to the UK only, but in this case it seems that UK users have more trust in clicking the .com ad more than they would a .co.uk TLD to find what they are looking for.

I may test this further over the next couple of weeks by targeting additional countries such as the US and Australia to see if the difference in performance increases further for the .com ad as would be expected.

No related posts.

Struggling to make your online marketing sparkle?

SEOptimise SEO

If you liked this post, you'll love what we can do with your SEO, PPC and online marketing campaigns. You can have the authors of this blog work directly on your campaigns!

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Kes 08.08.07 at 11:44 am

You said the destination URL was the same whether you displayed a .co.uk or the .com. Is this within Adwords guidelines?

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>