<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons To Use a Folder Name URL Structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2007/08/5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2007/08/5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url</link>
	<description>SEO Blog &#38; Search Engine Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2007/08/5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url.html#comment-89818</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seoptimise.com/?p=439#comment-89818</guid>
		<description>We have seen a marked improvement to SEO by changing the URL structure of folders to be more readable to the search engines and visitors to the site. So agree it is beneficial. LT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have seen a marked improvement to SEO by changing the URL structure of folders to be more readable to the search engines and visitors to the site. So agree it is beneficial. LT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bt</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2007/08/5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url.html#comment-52855</link>
		<dc:creator>bt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seoptimise.com/?p=439#comment-52855</guid>
		<description>Yeah but how do search engines view these structures? Is it more beneficial to use folders rather than have everything in the root?

For example, if  mywebcompany.com offers 4 main services, each with sub services, is it better to have:

mywebcompany.com/service1/index.html
mywebcompany.com/service1/subservice1.html ...and so on

OR

mywebcompany.com/service1.html
mywebcompany.com/service1a.html
mywebcompany.com/service2.html  ...and so on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but how do search engines view these structures? Is it more beneficial to use folders rather than have everything in the root?</p>
<p>For example, if  mywebcompany.com offers 4 main services, each with sub services, is it better to have:</p>
<p>mywebcompany.com/service1/index.html<br />
mywebcompany.com/service1/subservice1.html &#8230;and so on</p>
<p>OR</p>
<p>mywebcompany.com/service1.html<br />
mywebcompany.com/service1a.html<br />
mywebcompany.com/service2.html  &#8230;and so on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2007/08/5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url.html#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seoptimise.com/?p=439#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>Manny, the easy to do this is using .htaccess to automatically rewrite URL&#039;s. This works especially well for dynamic, database-driven websites which would use URL ID&#039;s by default, for example Wordpress does this but the URL structure can be changed easily with a small piece of .htaccess code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manny, the easy to do this is using .htaccess to automatically rewrite URL&#8217;s. This works especially well for dynamic, database-driven websites which would use URL ID&#8217;s by default, for example WordPress does this but the URL structure can be changed easily with a small piece of .htaccess code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2007/08/5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url.html#comment-2915</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seoptimise.com/?p=439#comment-2915</guid>
		<description>If I have many web pages in one category, do I put them all in the same folder or each of them have a folder name?  let&#039;s say my site has 200 webpages, do I make 200 folder names, one for each page?

Manny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I have many web pages in one category, do I put them all in the same folder or each of them have a folder name?  let&#8217;s say my site has 200 webpages, do I make 200 folder names, one for each page?</p>
<p>Manny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcrilf</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2007/08/5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url.html#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>mcrilf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seoptimise.com/?p=439#comment-217</guid>
		<description>How are you handling the potential negative effect this re-structure will have on your search visibility?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With external links to old .asp pages, are you 301-redirecting to the new pages?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Is this the best way of handling a re-structure?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m about to re-structure a client&#039;s site in a major way and would love some tips on how to ensure there is no negative effect on search visibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are you handling the potential negative effect this re-structure will have on your search visibility?</p>
<p>With external links to old .asp pages, are you 301-redirecting to the new pages?</p>
<p>Is this the best way of handling a re-structure?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m about to re-structure a client&#8217;s site in a major way and would love some tips on how to ensure there is no negative effect on search visibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2007/08/5-reasons-to-use-folder-name-url.html#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seoptimise.com/?p=439#comment-181</guid>
		<description>*** Another factor with this change was because it&#039;s possible the site will be moving from a Windows server to Linux in the near future. This means that the ASP file extensions would have to be changed to PHP. ***&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In fact the extension does not matter. I run PHP sites that show .html URLs. There is a PHP-scripted site that shows .asp URLs. You can use any extension you like. It doesn&#039;t matter what it is. With apache it is a one-line job to set up each extension.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However I do agree that &quot;folder URLs&quot; are even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*** Another factor with this change was because it&#8217;s possible the site will be moving from a Windows server to Linux in the near future. This means that the ASP file extensions would have to be changed to PHP. ***</p>
<p>In fact the extension does not matter. I run PHP sites that show .html URLs. There is a PHP-scripted site that shows .asp URLs. You can use any extension you like. It doesn&#8217;t matter what it is. With apache it is a one-line job to set up each extension.</p>
<p>However I do agree that &#8220;folder URLs&#8221; are even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Theme:              ee430
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.seoptimise.com @ 2012-02-11 14:10:49 -->
