25 Outdated SEO Terms & Tactics vs Their Modern Alternatives
Some terms are even meaningless by now so that you have to change your mindset completely.
keyword density/stuffing - killer content creation
Back in the days the more you mentioned a keyword (keyword density) the better you performed in the search results. It was long ago. For years it’s the other way around. You create highly contentious and linkable killer content to get popular with users and the links push you in the search results, even if your keyword is mentioned just a few times.
PageRank optimization - authority links
Some people really say “PageRank optimization”. PageRank optimization is like Pen** enlargement. Bigger does not mean better performance. Recommendations by respectable websites still count but the simple fact that you are linked there often is worth more that the PageRank that gets passed.
metatag optimization - tagging/folksonomy
Like in the above example this is a term that was always disproportionally focusing on one aspect. This aspect is nowadays almost meaningless. The meta keywords tag can be dropped altogether. If you want to add keywords to your page, try tags or even better folksonomy (tagging by many people collectively) to enrich your content in the visible content area.
SEO copywriting for spiders - SEO copywriting for users
Are you interested in “SEO Services SEO Company India Search Engine Optimization (SEO) India”? Probably not, that’s why you are reading a “SEO blog” offering “Internet Marketing News” from the “UK”.
article marketing - business blogging
Article marketing was big when it was important to get many links from different websites and IPs. Duplicate content issues, low quality and other disadvantages made it less of an viable option. At the same time business blogging has really taken shape. It works far better for generating links than article marketing. Of course it’s a lot more reputable.
search engine submission - xml sitemaps, pinging
It’s amazing how some services still offer search engine submission (to hundreds of search engines sometimes). While in most countries Google is basically a monopoly, rarely more than 5 search engines matter at all. Three of them enable you to use XML sitemaps to “submit”. While this is a viable way of submitting to search engines, it’s still better to ping Google at it’s BlogSearch with a blog post instead to get instantly indexed.
checking rankings - checking 33 other metrics
Some people obsess about ranking as much as about PageRank (some even mix up both terms). Rankings differ though depending on the place you search from and your personal search history among others. So in short two people in most cases won’t see the same search results. You should consider measuring some of these above linked 33 website success metrics instead.
reciprocal linking - linking out
No, the modern version of reciprocal linking are not three way links schemes or something. As long as the link swapping works artificially on the premise of barter it’s outdated. It takes much more time and effort to attempt to find suitable link partners than just linking out to the blogs in your niche you favor. While not everybody will link back some will if your content is a king and not just a peasant. Some people even will link you even more than you linked them in many instances. These links will be perfectly natural too so they will count more than artificial exchanged links.
paid links/text link ads - sponsoring, charity
Some people just can’t get sex for free. It’s the same with webmasters. They want it now without the hassle, they still want to pay. Link love that is paid seldom works out in the long run, but there are ways to get valid links with a monetary investment. It’s indirect though. Sponsoring and charity done right will be great for both the artists, activist or non-profits receiving the funds and the company supporting them financially.
forum signature - homepage link on active social media profiles
Many people still use forums, especially forums that allow signatures that “pass PageRank”. Sometimes the signature is longer than the forum post itself and Google has taken this “SEO tactic” into account years ago. On the other hand there are lots of social media sites who let you add a link to your homepage in the profile. When you are contributing consistently to these your profile page gains more and more authority, also for Google.
footer links - content links
Just a few years ago people used to stuff their page footers with useless links to their link exchange partners. Bad news if you still do that: Google discounts those in most cases. What you need are content links. So make people write about you in their blogs by providing exceptional resources, up to the minute news or a unique analysis and opinion not repeating what everybody else said.
blog comments - trackbacks (comments on your blog)
Many people still comment on “dofollow blogs” as one of their major “link building” tactics. These links still might pass some Google juice but for how long and how much? It’s much better to write in your own blog about others bloggers or link and trackback them to get a response, a link back to your site or blog.
anchor text - topical pages/paragraphs
When people realized that you can rank higher if your link anchor text e.g. is <link>SEO blog</link> for a SEO blog they started to “build links” with the same anchor text over and over. Normal users don’t link with relevant anchor text, let alone the same anchor text everywhere. So soon Google adapted by discounting anchor text that is obviously SEOed. Moreover ever since Adsense appeared years ago, Google has been able to determine what’s around an element or on your page in the first place. So your “SEO blog” anchor text doesn’t matter much if the page is about dating.
noscript tag links - no flash or ajax versions
Webmasters discovered the noscript tag to insert lots of invisible links in pages that look legitmate to search engines. Unfortunately they do not for a few years now. You should provide an alternative version for non-flash or non-AJAX users though if you have a fancy menu for instance. Load the Flash or AJAX-free menu for those who have switched of scripts or haven’t Flash installed. These links are also useful for search bots.
hidden counter links - widgets with “more” links
Some free counter services still force you to add not only invisible links to the counter homepage but to completely irrelevant third party sites. Of course this is crap nowadays and won’t last. One user who reports it to Google suffices. In Web 2.0 times and beyond there appeared lots of widgets for blogs and websites though that use such a method in a legitimate way. They offer basic info in a widget and add some more of it after clicking a link.
WordPress themes links - Firefox Add ons
For a while footer links in WordPress themes made WordPress theme designers the most popular web personalities on the Web. This problem of blown up link popularity has been discovered and dealt with in 2007 so you won’t get a “PageRank 7″ just by designing or porting a few themes. What’s still very popular though are Firefox extensions. Millions of people use Firefox and add ons. As most Firefox users are quite web-savvy they feature their favorite add ons on their blogs so that you get plenty of authority links once you write a popular extension.
too many directory links - generating buzz
While directory submission to a few directories (like a 12) still makes sense to get a site indexed in Google via the directory links it does not make sense to submit to hundreds of directories as these are often low value. Create a buzz around your site by viral videos or even good old press releases to get for link power.
HTML 3.2 - XHTML 1+
for a long time SEO experts advised to use the simplest HTML possible for Google, HTML 3.2 for instance. Sites designed in in this archaic HTML version looked accordingly. While the simplicity argument is still valid I made the best experiences with XHTML 1+ strict. It limits the code size naturally and you end up with being simple to crawl for Google and other bots.
guaranteed positions - ROI and conversions
Some SEO firms still proclaim to offer “guaranteed top positions” in Google, while in itself a misleading claim it does not make sense anymore to rely on rankings as these differ from place to place and computer to computer. Focus on ROI and conversions instead. If you like to guarantee a ROI of 200% or a 10% conversion rate it does make much more sense on the business level.
link building - getting links
The concept of link building has an underlying assumption of links that are artificially “build”. Otherwise it would be called “getting links” or something else, but building implies an active involvement of the SEO and actual manual inserting links somewhere. In contrast link baiting and other more common methods nowadays rely on other means than sheer “building” to get links in a natural, organic way. Built links will always be subject to the search engine’s quality team’s scrutiny. Completely organic links can’t be filtered out obviously.
PageRank Sculpting - Making every page matter and useful
This one seems to be an accepted practice of many in the SEO industry while, others, whom I support, advise against it. PageRank sculpting means that some pages on a website are linked by nofollowed internal links to ensure that other, more important pages get more Google juice. While this seemingly makes sense, most people overdo it and in some cases even whole sites get nofollowed by accident. Recently I encountered several sites that were completely made non-indexable for search engines via noindex/nofollow for no reason. Many webmasters will for instance nofollow the contact page in order not to make it the most important page in Google (as it’s linked from everywhere). In fact in many cases it is though, people are searching just for your address or a company nearby, especially via iPhone or other mobile phones.
forums - communities
Do you consider adding a forum to your site? Well, think twice. Forums are problem oriented (people go to forums to solve a problem) and people using them are often aggressive. Social communities on the other hand add a far more positive enhancement to a site. Adding content is based on popularity and thus good content is submitted. Sphinn is the best example for that in spite of the fact that recently some try to superimpose their condescending and aggressive behavior on the community. It seems that with growing popularity you also face these problems with communities but it’s not a wide spread inherent problem like with forums.
outstanding frontpage design - landing pages, usable check out forms
Not a cool homepage counts, or at least not solely, but clean and focused landing pages as well as working and usable check out forms for visitors to complete a purchase.
cluttered portal like pages - white space and focused pages with no distractions
Do you remember portals? Google made them obsolete but amazingly enough some commercial sites still try to imitate the portals of the late nineties. These sites work by overwhelming the visitor with information overflow. The logic behind that is that the user will get stuck somewhere, find something out of the hundreds of links to click. This doesn’t work though. People bounce off the site and search for another one less cramped. You need to offer white space for strained eyes to rest and focused pages no distractions that offer exactly what the visitors wants one keyword per page.
DMOZ - Delicious Popular
Some people submitted their pages to DMOZ directory to get an authority link and they still are waiting after 2 years or more. DMOZ is an epic failure of an elitist directory system. Instead try to get on the Delicious homepage, here you get many more valuable links. Delicious killed the DMOZ star.
While on most of the above mentioned issues most experts will agree, some of them are debatable but nonetheless you have to face them and decide whether you keep with the old ways or adapt to new web environment.

















Thanks for that realy very useful info and loved the suggestion to go for Delicious instead of DMOZ
Comment by The flash designer — September 12, 2008 @ 1:33 am
Due to the fact that I’m struggling trying to make a forum work on one of my websites, I’m interested by your comment about scrapping it and moving to a community model. I’ve only got around 5 regular contributors to the forum. There are a few one-off posters and a lot of spammers.
How would you suggest moving this to a community style? And are people more likely to post to a community than to a forum?
Thanks for a good article.
Comment by Adam Christie — September 12, 2008 @ 7:16 am
really useful article, interesting what you say about anchor linking! this is still a highly promoted means of seo by many
Comment by onewayseo — September 12, 2008 @ 8:17 am
I do enjoy your mega-lists. They are great reference points.
Comment by Felicity — September 12, 2008 @ 8:30 am
Hi Tad,
Very very interesting article! Thumbs up.. I do agree with most points expressed here..I liked the forums - commuities part better!
Also noticied “checking rankings - checking 33 other metrics” has broken link.. re-directrs me (& others) to blog home page. I guess it should be linking here rather - http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/08/33-website-success-metrics-instead-of-rankings-google-pagerank-and-traffic.html (found via Google Custom Search).
Great job Tad! Looking forward for more such informative articles..!
Cheers,
Vinay
Comment by Vinay — September 12, 2008 @ 2:44 pm
Thank you guys for the kind words.
Adam: 5 regular contributors are perfectly enough for my SEO 2.0 group at Mixx for instance. It depends on the topic and the site though. The SEOmoz community works very good at making people contribute.
Vinay, thanks for the feedback. Fixed.
Comment by Tad Chef — September 12, 2008 @ 4:55 pm
Good read and useful on a number of levels
Comment by Hobo — September 12, 2008 @ 7:10 pm
Would love too see how you will manage to get a smaller source with xhtml 1.0 strict than html4.01.
Alot of good points tho. To bad SEO products are lagging behind. This means that we developers have to adapt to their “standard” too.
Comment by Steinmann — September 13, 2008 @ 8:34 am
Some very useful and interesting points Tad, thanks.
Did you see the recent eyetracking study at Think Eyetracking? http://thinkeyetracking.com/wordpress/?p=4
That would seem to suggest that rankings are still very important (though I understand your point about different people seeing different results)
Cheers, Jon
Comment by Jon — September 13, 2008 @ 4:29 pm
I’d say meta-tags are still important - but not in the way they used to be. Now, they’re handy if you use unique descriptions tags. Don’t overdo it or stuff them, but I recommend keeping them around to stay out of supplemental results.
Good read, though!
Comment by kpaul — September 13, 2008 @ 7:20 pm
Great post. By the way that last link about Delicious is broken. Take out one of the 2008s.
Comment by Mark @ Magic SEO — September 13, 2008 @ 8:16 pm
ah, well, also kind of outdated: creating obsolete lists for the sole purpose of link baiting, posting olds for news, and reinventing the seo industry by inventing new names for the same old methods. seo = sooo boring…
Comment by marcuhlig — September 13, 2008 @ 9:05 pm
Thanks for the suggestion, delicious is a better route, I have even paid for a few guaranteed inclusions for DMOZ, and that was a year ago:)
Comment by seo guy, Stat — September 14, 2008 @ 2:10 am
Re: “when it was important to get many links from different websites and IPs”. Are you saying this is no longer worth while ? If so, anything to back this ? Thanks, AL.
Comment by AL — September 15, 2008 @ 5:28 am
very nice list! i think its really important to be informed of the latest trends in the internet market, because specially the seo suggestions change quite often
Comment by Istioselida — September 15, 2008 @ 7:14 am
Thanks Hobo, very appreciated.
Steinmann: Using XHTML 1.1 strict you indeed tend to drop tables, externalize all CSS and JS and make the HTML as clean as possible while in HTML 4 you tend to be lazy and code “quick and dirty” having all kinds of iline styles, scripts and tables polluting your code.
Yeah, Jon, right, eyetracking is very useful even advised to use in my 33 metrics post but you have to take into account that even if you are number one for all users you still have to get the clicks, conversions and sales and those d not depend only on the ranking.
kpaul: the meta description still matters as Google users see what’s in there and decide based on it whether they visit your site or not. So write a short, inviting sentence about you.
Marc @ Magic SEO. Thanks. I have no idea how the date got cloned there.
marcuhlig: Really sorry to disappoint you! It works fine all of the time, that’s why people like you get envious.
seo guy: You paid and they did not include you? They suck more than I imagined.
AL: It’s not just about the IPs anymore. If the content is the same everywhere the IP does not matter that much anymore. when bloggers link you each link counts.
Istio: To be honest these are not the latest trends, most have been around for a while but sadly the general public needs quite a time to notice.
Comment by Tad Chef — September 15, 2008 @ 1:57 pm
Fascinating article indeed, except for one problem: do you have any idea how confusing all this is to SEO rookies? I am swimming in a veritable sea of contrary ideas and the “pressure to succeed” kraken is extending his slimy tendrils from the depths.
Linking out works versus linking out doesn’t work, keywords matter versus content matters, even Ranking matters versus ROI matters…makes me want to throw my hat into the ring…and I JUST figured out what color it’s supposed to be.
Comment by Boris — September 15, 2008 @ 3:17 pm
Well put. This is one of the best articles I have read in awhile. I think the days of forcing a bunch of crap links are coming to a close. It truly is becoming about earning it.
Comment by UWS — September 15, 2008 @ 6:09 pm
tad chef: i am not quite sure what you mean with ‘people like me’, so i will take it as a compliment.
and i think you also confuse ‘me being envious’ with ‘me having another opinion on this whole subject’.
i mean come on, i think i made some valid points, are you not open for a discussion?
but let me explain, maybe i wasn’t clear enough:
i am not sure if you were around 5 years ago, but i am sure you read about what was going on in the seo industry back than. so which of these strategies are still working today? what conclusions can one draw from this?
sooner or later search engines and users will catch up and be able to identify content that actually does add value, so what i am saying is that i think the whole seo industry is going into the wrong direction.
shouldn’t we focus on long term goals and work for the user? the keyword here is usability… my claim is that everybody would be better off this way, but that’s just my opinion.
what do you think?
Comment by marcuhlig — September 15, 2008 @ 6:40 pm
Thanks for the informative, some of what you put out here was intuitive for me but much was a real eye opener.
Thanks again!
Comment by Tumblemoose — September 16, 2008 @ 12:29 am
Well done list for the future of SEO
Comment by web design company — September 16, 2008 @ 12:37 am
cool article…. we will have to consider this seriously.
thanks for this.
Comment by webpage design — September 16, 2008 @ 6:40 am
Boris: Don’t despair. It’s trial and error. It’s important what works for you. Some people won’t succeed with linking out if they have a crappy blog. So it depends on you and often also how hard you try.
marcuhlig: If you want discussion don’t nag but voice an opinion with valid points. In fact I’m doing full time SEO for 4 years (did you read my bio?
and I’m glad that SEO is not the cesspool it has been 5 years ago anymore. It’s nice and clean and shiny and it works if you want it. Why is that? It’s because SEO and Usability (the concept is also called findability) are closely intertwined nowadays.
At others: Thanks for the feedback but remember that leaving bot-like comments on blogs using “nofollow” does even make less sense than on those which do follow but probably delete comments added solely for the purpose of “link building”.
Comment by Tad Chef — September 16, 2008 @ 4:47 pm
I have a lot of respect for this list. I’ve printed it out and it’s been tacked to my wall. Thank you for the effort it took to compile it!
Comment by Will — September 16, 2008 @ 6:31 pm
Very useful and interesting article. I setup a blog and forum for my employer around the same time but the forum gets like no activity. I see your point to nix it to have less headaches.
Comment by Steve — September 16, 2008 @ 6:39 pm
Some good points, but I think that some of the “outdated” tactics are still very much used and sadly very sucessfull (for some). I won’t name names but there are quite a few sites doing well using the old hidden stat counter link, and also things like the Digital Point co-op.
Comment by Tom — September 18, 2008 @ 3:00 am
I dont think that a trackback is in any way better than a comment. By commenting on other blogs you can get a response as well.
Comment by Malte Landwehr — September 18, 2008 @ 7:04 am
Keyword stuffing according to me is the most outdated practice of SEO. I’ve come across so many sites that were penalized by Google because of this.
Comment by SEO Company India — September 18, 2008 @ 7:22 am
[...] who grab attention by reinforcing prejudice. On the other hand we’re in the middle of huge changes taking place in the SEO industry or should I say… yes, [...]
Pingback by Quo Vadis: SEO Has 5 Futures | SEOptimise — September 18, 2008 @ 1:27 pm
This is a devastatingly clear article. The merging of usability and SEO will be realized when google manages to go far enough to make it vain for link builders and anchor text cut n’ pasters to create popularity out of thin air. The effort will become too great, and involvement in communities will be unavoidable - real involvement this time. It’s fascinating to see where it leads us, but for this to happen technology has to follow. I would be surprised if it didn’t.
Comment by jp — September 26, 2008 @ 8:10 pm
Great Post Tad, so that SEO is techniques are updated now. I am planning to optimize by website, so where can I find the material for good SEO techniques. It will be greatful if you can provide me the complete information on SEO.
Comment by New Properties for Sale in Scotland — October 9, 2008 @ 1:41 pm
Thanks for this great post. Its always great to be kept up to date with the latest news and info on this changeable topic
Comment by Haroun Kola — October 9, 2008 @ 5:46 pm
Excellent information - we’re redesigning right now and avoiding the outdated mistakes. Thanks for the valuable material.
Comment by Carolyn — October 16, 2008 @ 7:36 pm
As the owner of a website, finding new ways to advertise your website is sometimes a mind blowing task. Link bidding is a terrific approach to getting the word out on your website. A bid directory offers webmasters the opportunity to bid on a sponsored spot. After you submit specific details about your website, your bid will also determine how much PR your website will receive along with back links from other listed websites.
Comment by Free Directory Submission — November 6, 2008 @ 8:24 am
Thanks for a great article. Interesting to see how things have moved on. Rankings are very important to customers though, as is ROI.
Comment by Fuze Design - Web Design Berkshire — November 19, 2008 @ 9:42 am