PageRank Sculpting: Advanced SEOs Fooled by Cat Blogger

Recently a large part of the SEO industry, or rather the advanced SEOs got fooled by a cat blogger who happens to work for Google. What happened? Let me explain in depth:
So called PageRank sculpting has been a bizarre practice of the SEO industry. It was about selectively hurting your website in order to push other parts of it.
PageRank sculpting was based on the assumption that if you have a hypothetical website of 10 pages each of it having one point of authority (Google PageRank) you end up having more of it on the remaining pages if you cripple some of them by stopping the flow of PageRank to to some pages.
Thus, ideally, you would end up with having 10 points on 8 pages in case you’d cripple your own website by using the so called nofollow attribute on two of your pages. To be more exact: You’d use the nofollow attribute on internal links to these pages. This was based on the declaration by above mentioned cat blogger.
As far as I know Google has never officially recommend the practice of PageRank sculpting.
Correct me if I err and add the source in the comments. There are some instances on official Google sites that address PageRank sculpting. This Google Webmaster Central blog post does and this Google Webmaster Help thread by Matt Cutts does as well. Both rather discourage the use of PageRank sculpting. In contrast Matt Cutts himself more than once encouraged webmasters to employ PageRank sculpting to the point where SEO practitioners took some pride in using this “advanced SEO” method.
I don’t recommend using nofollow on your own pages for several reasons.
Using nofollow on internal links is an excuse for not optimizing your site structure and internal pages.
Let’s take a look at what pages usually end up nofollowed internally, for instance:
- contact pages
- register/log in pages
- duplicate content pages (like categories or date archives)
- TOS (Terms of Service), copyright and other legal notices
- less important pages
Around 2006/2007 I also tried this tactic to prevent contact pages etc. from showing up in Google results as the most important part of my sites. On second thought I got suspicious though: What happens with the links from those pages? If they don’t get any authority or PageRank, they won’t inherit it to the pages they link to either. That’s bad I thought.
This wasted potential was just one reason to abandon nofollow for PageRank sculpting as an on page optimization tactic. This and other annoyances made me believe that PageRank sculpting is more of an issue than a SEO tactic.
Instead of using nofollow on links leading to the above mentioned pages you should optimize them.
- Contact pages are really the most important part of many businesses. So you should add a contact form, phone number or link to a contact page on each page of your site to get more conversions.
- Register/log in pages are in many cases also meant to lead to a conversion. They convert a user from simple guest to a registered or logged in user. Here too a log in or register form should be accessible from everywhere, as a drop down layer for instance.
- Duplicate content pages: Either don’t create duplicate content in the first place or simply make sure that the original is linked and presented more prominently. Google boast to determine duplicates by now. As a last resort you can block them via robots.txt or noindex meta tag but be careful, don’t hide half of your site by accident.
- The TOS etc. in most cases is a much too log piece of gibberish nobody can read and understand anyways. Often its presented in a way you barely can read it due to basic readability concerns. Make the TOS available in PDF format for everybody to print out. I’m sure this is best for users and your PDFs won’t outrank you. Otherwise just use robot.txt and the noindex meta tag here too.
- Less important pages should be less important structurally. Give’em a boring title and headline, link’em at the bottom of the page etc.
The nofollow attribute itself turned out to be a big failure.
The failure of the nofollow attribute became clearer as time went by and Google forced webmasters to add the nofollow attribute to all kinds of links while initially it was meant to combat comment spam in blogs etc.
When Google decided to make the nofollow attribute obligatory for paid links nofollow became more of a tool to suppress webmasters than to assist them.
By now most websites that determine the importance and popularity on the Web today use the nofollow attribute on all outgoing links. Sites like Twitter, Delicious or StumbleUpon which reflect the preferences of thousands or even millions of Web users can’t be taken into account by Google to determine rankings according to the nofollow policy. This way Google really shoots itself in the foot sabotaging its owns means of assessing the value of web pages for search results.
So we got three by now obsolete or failed concepts here:
- PageRank sculpting – hurting your sites selectively to push other parts of it, now seemingly abandoned according to rumors, it’s hurting your site overall now
- nofollow attribute – meant to combat spam and later to devalue paid links, but it hasn’t worked in both cases, spam and paid link still abound
- PageRank itself – determining importance of pages by the number and authority of links doesn’t work when most authority links (Twitter, Delicious, StumbleUpon etc.) doesn’t carry PageRank at all
This opinion might be deemed somewhat radical both by Google representatives and SEO experts as well. The more common sense approach voiced here nevertheless amounts to ignoring PageRank sculpting as well.
My advice:
Don’t listen to a cat blogger for SEO advice.
Use some common sense instead. Even in case that PageRank sculpting still works as described above and the rumors are not true it’s a waste of time, resources and potentially dangerous to your site’s performance on Google results. Advanced SEO is not about blindly following a cat blogger. You may be advancing in the wrong direction.
Btw. Did you know that SEOptimise does not employ nofollow on its site?







June 4th, 2009 at 4:20 pm
Great post Tad, well spotted about SEOptimise not using nofollow too!
Completely agree that nofollow tags may have a negative impact over how a website is crawled and prevents link value being passed from the blocked pages. Surely “noindex, follow” is a more sensible option in this case? Plus I’ve always felt that contact details/about us/privacy policy/terms and conditions etc (which are often nofollowed links) are very important in terms of highlighting the trust and creditability of a website. So blocking access to these pages because they are not optimised may cause additional problems to a sites overall search performance.
June 4th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
Btw. Kevin Gibbons name above is “nofollowed”!
June 5th, 2009 at 7:10 am
Mike, yes that’s because it’s a blog comment. In this case nofollow helps in order to keep control of the external sites we link to on the site.
In this case my profile page is an internal link but all comments are treated the same way, it’s definitely not done for “PageRank sculpting” reasons.
June 8th, 2009 at 8:48 am
So the links at this post that you gibe to searchengineland’s are DOFOLLOW?
I use nofollow at my blog to drive pagerank within my own pages.I no follow most of the links i give out to other blogs or threads from other sites and i knwo that this technique is used by many big sites.I was wondering whether i should stop doing it now that there are those rumors…
What do you suggest?
June 8th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
geobak: I always use real links for linking out on blogs. How else do you want to show other bloggers that you really do trust them and their writings? Linking out is the best link building strategy. People notice you and link back. It’s as simple as that.
June 8th, 2009 at 7:59 pm
“Linking out is the best link building strategy.”
This may be true for *some* industries, but for the most part, wow do I ever disagree with that statement. If that were the case, I’d be advising my clients to simply link to all their competitors. It’s *much* better to just have the competitor link to my client ;)
As for nofollow, I let the link juice flow freely (both internal and external)… within my posts. Links that are repetitive (i.e. they show up on every page) though (such as my blog roll) are nofollowed everywhere but the homepage. I’m happy with the results and so are the people I link to because 1 homepage link can be more beneficial than the same link sitewide.
Thanks for the post. It was most informative. Shame it never went hot.
June 9th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Melanie: Read closely please and do not cut the context when citing. Obviously I refer to blogs and not to corporate sites itself. Also just linking out to your competitors is plainly stupid: I wonder why you bring it up? Is it irony?
On the other hand there are no competitors when you blog (watch out I refer to blogs here again, not corporate sites). There are just blogging colleagues. I blog for clients in different industries and languages. In niches where there are only a few blogs or where bloggers link less than in the SEO industry. Nonetheless I achieved great results. Also I link out like hell on my own SEO 2.0 blog for almost 2 years now and guess who’s #4 for seo blog globally? Me, not the other bloggers I linked out to numerous times.
It’s a very old tactic btw. as Google has been identifying so called “hub sites” for years and pushing them up in the rankings. Hub sites are sites that link out plenty ;-) In case you prefer dead end sites it’s your choice but don’t tell me that linking out does not work just because you don’t know how to do it. I still can’t believe it: Did you just suggest I should link out to competitors?
On the PageRank sculpting thing: When you choose to spend valuable hours of work on that, it’s your choice. It’s tedious and dangerous and as you see now you don’t even know if it works at all in your favor. In case your clients like to pay for that, great for you, not so great for them. I prefer real optimization techniques instead of selectively hurting your own site or by now hurting it altogether.
June 16th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
[...] Beard did. So I read the “nofollow is dead” posting which is of course called “PageRank sculpting” to hide the fact that Google admits its failure with the nofollow [...]
June 17th, 2009 at 12:50 am
[...] Beard did. So I read the “nofollow is dead” posting which is of course called “PageRank sculpting” to hide the fact that Google admits its failure with the nofollow [...]
July 6th, 2009 at 4:43 pm
[...] Beard did. So I read the “nofollow is dead” posting which is of course called “PageRank sculpting” to hide the fact that Google admits its failure with the nofollow [...]
August 1st, 2009 at 4:56 am
[...] Beard did. So I read the “nofollow is dead” posting which is of course called “PageRank sculpting” to hide the fact that Google admits its failure with the nofollow [...]
August 11th, 2009 at 7:49 am
[...] Beard did. So I read the “nofollow is dead” posting which is of course called “PageRank sculpting” to hide the fact that Google admits its failure with the nofollow [...]
August 13th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
[...] PageRank Sculpting: Advanced SEOs Fooled by Cat Blogger Interesting argument over the practice of PageRank Sculpting. [...]