<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BingHoo? Recap of the Yahoo/Microsoft Search Agreement!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2009/07/binghoo-heres-a-recap-of-the-yahoomicrosoft-search-deal.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2009/07/binghoo-heres-a-recap-of-the-yahoomicrosoft-search-deal.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=binghoo-heres-a-recap-of-the-yahoomicrosoft-search-deal</link>
	<description>SEO Blog &#38; Search Engine Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2009/07/binghoo-heres-a-recap-of-the-yahoomicrosoft-search-deal.html#comment-74704</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/?p=2729#comment-74704</guid>
		<description>I think this should streamline efforts a great deal for businesses. yahoo gets to cut back on overhead and Bing gets to grow their search engine which they have wanted to do for quite sometime now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this should streamline efforts a great deal for businesses. yahoo gets to cut back on overhead and Bing gets to grow their search engine which they have wanted to do for quite sometime now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2009/07/binghoo-heres-a-recap-of-the-yahoomicrosoft-search-deal.html#comment-74677</link>
		<dc:creator>steveballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/?p=2729#comment-74677</guid>
		<description>http://www.flickr.com/photos/ballmerrockz/3772437308/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ballmerrockz/3772437308/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/ballmerrockz/3772437308/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gidseo</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2009/07/binghoo-heres-a-recap-of-the-yahoomicrosoft-search-deal.html#comment-74634</link>
		<dc:creator>Gidseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/?p=2729#comment-74634</guid>
		<description>IMHO it&#039;s a tragic loss of great search engine.
Yahoo crawls new websites 2-3 weeks before Bing and a week before Goog.
Yahoo uses some incredibly clever technology to use old computers to fuel their SE.
Yahoo shares backlink info.
B &amp; G do none of the above.
All in all I think it would have been far better to have Bing powered by Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO it&#8217;s a tragic loss of great search engine.<br />
Yahoo crawls new websites 2-3 weeks before Bing and a week before Goog.<br />
Yahoo uses some incredibly clever technology to use old computers to fuel their SE.<br />
Yahoo shares backlink info.<br />
B &amp; G do none of the above.<br />
All in all I think it would have been far better to have Bing powered by Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Theme:              ee430
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.seoptimise.com @ 2012-02-11 19:08:30 -->
