Contact us

Twitter Friday: hashtag Marketing vs Spam vs Censorship

Posted on July 6th, 2009 by Tad Chef

hashtags

Due to server problems we could not publish the Twitter Friday column last week. Now we’re back up. So here it is. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Some #moonfruit anybody? Yesterday’s no name is today’s superstar when it comes to effective so called “hashtag” Twitter marketing. It’s goal is to make it to the Twitter.com homepage popular topics list. Some already consider it spam. Why?

Moonfruit made people tweet their hashtag in order to win a prize. Their success was immediate, huge and long lasting. I won’t tell you what prize was offered in order not to advertise both the product and the company too much. They give away one prize per day to one of the thousands of people who tweet something adding their hashtag to it. So in a way it’s an indirect pay per tweet scheme.

While RWW already attacks all marketers as spammers (good old link baiting strategy) the issue at stake is more than marketing vs spam or even marketing = spam.

It’s also about free speech as the anti-spam filters already have blocked false positives. The most obvious example of this is the hashtag #MrsSlocombesPussy a popular one among UK users and a censored one by the US Twitter admins with no understanding of British humor.

As a SEO I encounter the spam accusation quite frequently as you can imagine although I haven’t spammed anybody in my whole life. Thus I won’t accept this as well. First let me say something about Twitter and marketers to challenge the “Twitter needs a marketer filter” linkbait:

Statistics show that marketers are the hard core users of Twitter.

The most active Twitter users are marketers statistically. Knowing sites like Digg and elsewehere this is no surprise to you. Marketers actually need new media tools to spread their message thus they promote those tools that work in the desired way to stardom. Where would Twitter be today without all the marketers who uised an evangelized it for free? It would be another me too service among a myriad of startups.

When using Twitter correctly you barely get any spam. I don’t in spite of following approx. 400 marketers ;-) Unless of course you assume that links about marketing and SEO are spam like the average disgruntled teenage geek on Digg does while promoting Apple marketing messages at the same time.

Twitter itself did not remove the #moonfruit campaign. So obviously the staff does not consider it to be spam. To be honest: I think the line almost got crossed. We may see lots of copycats of that tactic soon so Twitter will probably act then. To me spam begins when you actually bribe people to say things. In this case it was almost bribery. Or when people promote things frantically just ta take part in a competition. One tweet about #moonfruit, two or three OK but more than that? If I were Twitter I’d curb this by a single line of code. Watch out, pseudo code ahead:

“If hashtag mentions more than 3 times by same user on same day delete from search and don’t count in popularity”

How would I undertake an ethical Twitter #hashtag marketing campaign? I would

  • not make the use of a particular hashtag obligatory. Usually people use a similar wording so at the end of the day you’d get popular anyways.
  • limit the number of tweets per user by stating that more than one tweet does not enhance the actual chances of winning
  • predefine a few tweets a person can use so that the effort of taking part gets minimized
  • require people to have a certain number of mutual friends in order to prevent setting up fake accounts
  • choose an intriguing word for the hashtag or slogan, part of the moonfruit success stems from the brand’s funny sounding name

One of the secrets of a successful marketing campaign is not to oversell and annoy people. The “any publicity is good publicity” proponents will disagree but what’s the use of a huge success when you get banned for it or there is a negative backlash for your brand like with the Oprah-KFC disaster?

Also note that nowadays not all popular items are hashtags so that you don’t even need a #hashtag probably. So don’t simply try to copy the for some people questionable success of the #moonfruit campaign. Be yourself and don’t try to bribe people.

Btw. I will try the Moonfruit service. I love their competitors Jimdo already! On the weekend another case of Twitter bombing has been done by some pranksters.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

13 Responses to “Twitter Friday: hashtag Marketing vs Spam vs Censorship”

  1. seoptimise (SEOptimise) says:

    New post from @onreact_com hashtag Marketing vs Spam vs Censorship http://tinyurl.com/noujhd

  2. kevgibbo (Kevin Gibbons) says:

    RT @seoptimise: New post from @onreact_com hashtag Marketing vs Spam vs Censorship http://tinyurl.com/noujhd

  3. annuartist (Annu Bhasin) says:

    Twitter Friday: hashtag Marketing vs Spam vs Censorship http://tinyurl.com/noujhd

  4. searchpanda (Annabel Hodges) says:

    @EdHudson it was a twitter hashtag comp – an example of good twitter usage. info here: http://tinyurl.com/noujhd

  5. japple (Jeff Nijsse) says:

    Another #moonfruit tweet?? Uh-oh, I’m playing right into their hands… http://tinyurl.com/noujhd So whos smarter after all?

  6. Twitter-Marketing Extrem: Moonfruit | moritzhanebeck.de says:

    [...] Update: Twitter scheint jetzt gegen Moonfruit vorgegangen zu sein. Nachdem Moonfruit aus den Top-Themen herausgenommen wurde beendet das britische Unternehmen die umstrittene Marketing-Aktion. Twitter äußerte sich nicht zu dem Thema. Das Ende des Hashtag-Marketings? [...]

  7. prycie (Catherine Pryce) says:

    http://tinyurl.com/noujhd how 2 a hashtag campaign

  8. marcmunier (Marc Munier) says:

    RT: @Prycie: http://tinyurl.com/noujhd how 2 a hashtag campaign Loving the @Prycie tweets today

  9. Tom Planer says:

    Very interesting article. Hashtag marketing and running competitions on twitter is quite intriguing, especially when prizes are involved. I saw a campaign run by size? (the JD sports owned trainer store) the other day where in order to win a prize you had to be one of the first 20 people to send a tweet to @sizeupdates. In the old days of twitter, this would have had a viral effect, but now it is difficult for users to see their friends tweets to other users without going to their actual twitter page.
    It would be interesting to know if they were aware of this before they set up the competition. No hashtags involved meant no trending topics coverage, and first 20 users means the competition is over within 5 minutes of starting. Was this a way to get new customers and followers or simply a reward for already following them on Twitter?

  10. Moonfruit Twitter Campaign Analyis | Social Media Guidelines says:

    [...] @spam 100 times.  The original offending Tweep can then also be traced and suspended. Similarly, Tad Chef suggests a simple query: “If hashtag mentions more than 3 times by same user on same day delete [...]

  11. Twitter Friday: hashtag Marketing vs Spam vs Censorship | SEOptimise | Twitter Bootcamp says:

    [...] Continue reading here: Twitter Friday: hashtag Marketing vs Spam vs Censorship | SEOptimise [...]

  12. The billboard that bleeds when it rains, and other stories « Qubemedia’s Weblog says:

    [...] Twitter: hashtag Marketing vs Spam vs Censorship [...]

  13. Social Media Commando says:

    Jumping the Shark…

    It’s true the marketing mavens hyped (maybe over-hyped) Twitter and so they could promote their own messages, but their own messages are vulnerable when the spamming gets out of hand.

    Consider TiVo. An entire business created out of the desire to avoid disruptive, intrusive marketing!

    Twitter already has its own version of TiVo to some extent. Consider that most Tweeters use third party Apps to share (sorry, Tweet) now. What marketers may miss is that these apps aren’t just for organization of friends and topics, they’re filtration systems.

    When any SocMed utility becomes too disruptive the coders get to work on blocking the noise so we can enjoy the signals more. In that sense it doesn’t really matter if Twitter adds a line of code to their Trending Topics formula. The trending addicts are mostly marketers and fame seekers. Content junkies will turn on their filters (TweetDeck, anyone?) and resume life on Twitter as normal.

    p.s. This is a great article on a fantastic site. I enjoy reading the blog and hope to make meaningful contributions via my comments. Cheers!

Leave a Reply