<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEOptimise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog</link>
	<description>UK Internet Marketing News &#124; PPC &#38; SEO Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>30 Ways to Get Links Naturally &#38; Stop Link Building</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/30-ways-to-get-links-naturally-stop-link-building.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/30-ways-to-get-links-naturally-stop-link-building.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[linkbait]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[getting links]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[how to getlinks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ways to get links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More and more conventional link building methods, like directory submission are of less and less value, Google does not even recommend high quality paid directories any more. In fact soon we&#8217;ll see a situation where all artificial ways of link building will be frowned upon.
On the other hand former SEOptimise writer and renowned UK search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More and more <strong>conventional link building methods, like directory submission are of less and less value</strong>, Google does not even recommend high quality paid directories any more. In fact soon we&#8217;ll see a situation where all artificial ways of link building will be frowned upon.</p>
<p>On the other hand former SEOptimise writer and renowned <a id="jwti" title="UK search marketing blogger" href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/" target="_blank">UK search marketing blogger</a> Patrick Altoft reported a few days ago about <a title="companies which spend thousands on link buying budgets" href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/the-paid-link-farce-is-3-years-old-get-your-act-together-google/" target="_blank">companies which spend thousands on link buying budgets</a> per month. This way of link acquisition is not allowed by Google for a long time by now and many high profile sites have been penalized already.</p>
<p>While the urge of <em>spending money on links</em> comes as no surprise it is met by an often low quality shady part of the SEO industry. Getting links naturally requires also an investment, an allocation of time and resources combined with know how in some Internet industries like web design or development but not solely.</p>
<p>The money gets spend not on the links directly but on a web venture that gets links naturally and sustainably over time. The allure of &#8220;free&#8221; is in most cases the key to get links but also altruism leads to a direct ROI in terms of links. So think twice before spending money directly on low quality links.</p>
<p>Stop link building artificially and use one or several of the following <strong>30 ways to get links naturally</strong>:</p>
<ol>
<li>Create a timeless or regularly updated resource list, example <a id="zy.i" title="Web developer's Handbook" href="http://www.alvit.de/handbook/" target="_blank">Web developer&#8217;s Handbook</a></li>
<li>Program a free tool or software everybody needs in a particular niche but not everybody offers yet (compare the query <a id="cc21" title="font tester" href="http://www.typetester.org/" target="_blank">font tester</a> vs color picker)</li>
<li>Develop a high quality theme or template for a well known platform like <a id="afh7" title="WordPress" href="http://designdisease.com/" target="_blank">WordPress</a>, Drupal, Joomla that gets updated along the software</li>
<li>Program a WordPress or other popular blog platform plugin, in the best case a platform independent one like <a id="wq98" title="Akismet" href="http://akismet.com/" target="_blank">Akismet</a></li>
<li>Develop a Firefox plugin for a recurring task or dealing with a widely spread annoyance like <a id="kn.b" title="BugMeNot" href="http://erichamiter.com/firefox/bugmenot/" target="_blank">BugMeNot</a></li>
<li>Organize a genuine yearly recurring competition like the <a id="s5me" title="Web 2.0 awards" href="http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0" target="_blank">Web 2.0 awards</a></li>
<li>Organize a Recurring charitable event like the <a id="ra3w" title="Blog Action Day" href="http://blogactionday.org/" target="_blank">Blog Action Day</a></li>
<li>Forge a lasting partnership with a similar service provider, like a graphic design agency joining forces with a <a id="dn9y" title="PSD2XHTML" href="http://www.professionalontheweb.com/psd2xhtml" target="_blank">PSD2XHTML</a> provider</li>
<li>Build a community like <a id="iyoa" title="9Rules" href="http://9rules.com/" target="_blank">9Rules</a> where people &#8220;proudly&#8221; are part of and display on it on their sites</li>
<li>Support artists with free or cheaper web hosting (or anything else they need) like <a id="e0ai" title="MediaTemple" href="http://www.mediatemple.net/webhosting/gs/" target="_blank">MediaTemple</a> does</li>
<li>Mirror a high traffic site, for instance an <a id="dg-0" title="open source software" href="http://www.hoxt.com/" target="_blank">open source software</a> or an activist site</li>
<li>Offer a rebate for a particular group, especially <a id="aiyy" title="students" href="http://www.tamron.com/lenses/students.asp" target="_blank">students</a> but also workers class families, veterans or whatever disadvantaged group</li>
<li>Offer free music or other audio downloads. or at least a way to listen to the audio online, that&#8217;s the secret of success of MySpace</li>
<li>Offer free ebook or better <a id="ubgg" title="free ebooks (more than one) like O'Reilly" href="http://oreilly.com/openbook/" target="_blank">free ebooks (more than one) like O&#8217;Reilly</a> for instance</li>
<li>Maintain a business blog updated regularly with high value resources, best example is <a id="kbvo" title="Inside CRM" href="http://www.insidecrm.com/" target="_blank">Inside CRM</a></li>
<li>Get your content translated and republished in multiple languages and countries</li>
<li>Join a community and become one of the most valuable members like Maki of <a id="d78l" title="DoshDosh" href="http://www.doshdosh.com/" target="_blank">DoshDosh</a> did on Sphinn and Digg</li>
<li>Offer high quality free icons for download and free use</li>
<li>Offer background patterns for free for web designers</li>
<li>Offer free wallpapers for download and invite artist to modify them</li>
<li>Create a Facebook application and maintain it over time</li>
<li>Create a CSS solutions for <a id="d" title="common tasks" href="http://cssglobe.com/post/1272/pure-css-data-chart" target="_blank">common tasks</a> or CSS problems or even better are <a id="he0u" title="whole set of solutions" href="http://code.google.com/p/blueprintcss/" target="_blank">whole set of solutions</a></li>
<li>Offer free scripts and &#8220;chunks code&#8221; (like CSS as it&#8217;s not a script) for webmasters to use freely</li>
<li>Create a highly useful and visually appealing Flash application like <a id="l5-6" title="SimpleViewer" href="http://www.airtightinteractive.com/simpleviewer/" target="_blank">SimpleViewer</a></li>
<li>Give away images using a <a id="j1m8" title="creative commons license" href="http://search.creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">creative commons license</a> on your website</li>
<li>Publish recipes for healthy, Italian, French, Chinese or any other kind of desirable food not everybody can buy</li>
<li>Offer fundamental self improvement advice like <a id="p7xq" title="Hack Yyourself" href="http://www.hackyourself.org/" target="_blank">hackyourself</a> does</li>
<li>Start a green initiative, whatever it might be, there are thousands of ways to do that, carbon free websites is great example</li>
<li>Educate children, especially from poor families be it in the West or down in the &#8220;global south&#8221;, e.g. the <a id="llu0" title="100 Dollar laptop" href="http://laptop.org/" target="_blank">100 Dollar laptop</a> gained huge recognition</li>
<li>Help animals and boast about it displaying images of them you don&#8217;t have to as obnoxious as PETA</li>
</ol>
<p>As you see many of these ways of getting links naturally are projects based on market forces or in other words on what many or most people need. The best thing on the Web is additionally that even free things normally not provided by the market can be offered in a profitable way as by gaining links the investment is made profitable at last.</p>
<p>Of course all these ways of getting links also get you reputation and fans and thus traction in social media too. People hate companies and busineses overselling but they love free stuff and those who offer it. When everybody loves you also those who are willing to spend money will find you.</p>
<p>In case you wonder now &#8220;how can I achieve that, I&#8217;m no programmer, designer, content creator, artist, activist&#8221; you don&#8217;t need to be, there are plenty out there are they&#8217;re short on money especially those from India. Sometimes even <a id="v_sm" title="100$" href="http://www.viperchill.com/case-study-10000-visitors/" target="_blank">100$</a> are enough.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/30-ways-to-get-links-naturally-stop-link-building.html">30 Ways to Get Links Naturally &amp; Stop Link Building</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/30-ways-to-get-links-naturally-stop-link-building.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay Per Chick; Targeting Conversions, Not Impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/ppc-in-the-pub-pay-for-conversions-not-impressions.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/ppc-in-the-pub-pay-for-conversions-not-impressions.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fergie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[google adwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its Friday afternoon, no one&#8217;s blogged on here for a while and I&#8217;ve been asked to step up to the plate without mentioning SpyFu. I should&#8217;ve been thinking of what to post for a few days now but I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;ve been a bit distracted&#8230;
So, I&#8217;m sitting in a bar with a nice cool pint. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Its Friday afternoon, no one&#8217;s blogged on here for a while and I&#8217;ve been asked to step up to the plate without mentioning SpyFu. I should&#8217;ve been thinking of what to post for a few days now but I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;ve been a bit distracted&#8230;</em></p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m sitting in a bar with a nice cool pint. I lean back in my chair and look around; what do I see?</p>
<p>That guy over there, he&#8217;s got one friend opposite him but he&#8217;s talking so the whole room can hear.&#8221;He&#8217;s not targeting his efforts&#8221; I think to myself, &#8220;expensive strategy but I guess he&#8217;s making a lot of impressions. I suppose his CTR can be quite low and he can still have a lot of success.&#8221; At this point I realise that AdWords has ruined my life but I can&#8217;t stop myself&#8230;</p>
<p>Thin skinny guy, black coat, black hair, band t-shirt. Leaning against the bar, nearly finished his drink. Looks like he&#8217;s watching the girls in the booth by the window.But he&#8217;s too slow, they&#8217;re leaving. Hang on, they&#8217;re not, some of them are just going to the toilet. But not all of them. Black haired guy finishes his drink and walks nervously over. There are two girls left, one them&#8217;s wearing a band t-shirt. I can&#8217;t hear what he says but I think &#8220;That&#8217;s more like it. He&#8217;s targeting his market&#8221;</p>
<p>Now who&#8217;s that? One guy, group of girls. The leggy blond doesn&#8217;t look particularly interested but one of her friends is flicking her hair and touching his arm. The guy is slowly ignoring the rest of the group and turning to face her. &#8220;Bidding too low&#8221; I remark, &#8220;he can&#8217;t keep his position with blondie.&#8221; Then I give him the benefit of the doubt; &#8220;placement targeting; he knows what converts best for him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Back to the skinny guy. He&#8217;s sitting on his own now; &#8220;high bounce rate?&#8221; I think as he gets up to go to the bar. But maybe not; band girl is coming out of the toilets, she looks at the booth where her friends are and then scans the rest of the bar. &#8220;Rookie error, he should&#8217;ve 301&#8242;d to his new location.&#8221; The girl pauses, lonely by the toilet door but not for long; &#8220;Are you looking for someone?&#8221; I hear. &#8220;Is that bidding on a competitors keyword?&#8221; I think. Skinny guy comes back around the bar with two drinks, his new friend smiles and walks over. &#8220;Brand recognition in action. And he gave her an incentive for a repeat visit.&#8221;</p>
<p>I see my own date in the door so I stand up and wave. I&#8217;m unusually tall, so my ad copy stands out from the crowd. I know she like this place, one of her friends told me, I hope just being here is good enough landing page optimisation. How forward should I be? Calls to action are good right? Perhaps it is at this point that my analogy breaks down, I don&#8217;t want to be too forward. Still, I hope I get a conversion.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/ppc-in-the-pub-pay-for-conversions-not-impressions.html">Pay Per Chick; Targeting Conversions, Not Impressions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/ppc-in-the-pub-pay-for-conversions-not-impressions.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Hacked? 7 Great Self Hosted Blog Platforms as WordPress Alternatives for SEO &#38; Business</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/wordpress-hacked-7-great-self-hosted-blog-platforms-as-wordpress-alternatives-for-seo-business.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/wordpress-hacked-7-great-self-hosted-blog-platforms-as-wordpress-alternatives-for-seo-business.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog platforms]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hacked]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress alternatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WordPress is the most popular blog platform for a while now and thus the main target of hackers just due to this fact. Also vulnerabilities pop up so often that you just can&#8217;t keep up with the hackers. Recently one of the many WordPress Blogs I look after got hacked again by an &#8220;online pharmacy&#8221;. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WordPress is the most popular blog platform</strong> for a while now and thus the main <strong>target of hackers</strong> just due to this fact. Also vulnerabilities pop up so often that you just can&#8217;t keep up with the hackers. Recently one of the many WordPress Blogs I look after got hacked again by an &#8220;online pharmacy&#8221;. <a href="http://linux.byexamples.com/archives/397/wordpress-exploit-we-been-hit-by-hidden-spam-link-injection/">Of course</a> <a href="http://deanhunt.com/has-your-wordpress-blog-been-hacked/">I&#8217;m not</a> <a href="http://ocaoimh.ie/2008/06/08/did-your-wordpress-site-get-hacked/">the only one</a>. It was the second hack with 3 months of this WordPress blog.</p>
<p>This time the hackers (or more aptly crackers) even blocked my access to the WordPress admin so that it took really hours of work to get it clean and running again. Ironically this blog was the one I kept up to date quite diligently, uploading a new WordPress version as often as I could. Sadly you have to do it almost weekly, yes there are plugins now to do that, but nonetheless you have to take a look what changed (sometimes a major overhaul of the admin interface) and whether your <span class="misspell">plugins</span> still work etc.</p>
<p>In short: It&#8217;s work and it&#8217;s tedious and it&#8217;s annoying but most of all, it&#8217;s dangerous!</p>
<blockquote><p>So I really can&#8217;t recommend WordPress blogs to clients anymore unless you know they&#8217;d be able to do all that upgrading and fixing.</p></blockquote>
<p>In case you need a reliable, easy to look after and secure blog platform for <a id="ufo4" title="corporate or business blogging" href="../2008/09/50-blog-post-ideas-for-business-blogging.html">corporate or business blogging</a> and if you want to host it yourself (still the best option for SEO etc.) you need a WordPress alternative.</p>
<p>I watch the blogosphere since 2001 and contribute since 2003 so I&#8217;ve seen plenty of blog platforms. There are at least <strong>7 great self hosted blog platforms that are good WordPress alternatives</strong>: All of them offer clean URLs, semantic markup (h1, h2 etc.) and similar SEO basics.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong><a id="ljff" title="MovableType" href="http://www.movabletype.org/" target="_blank"><span class="misspell">MovableType</span></a>:</strong> One of the most popular blog platforms. It has been bigger than WordPress a few years ago but it wasn&#8217;t Open Source and you had to pay for it so it lost market share. Now MT has open sourced and it is marketed aggressively as the <a id="rb_0" title="secure alternative" href="http://www.movabletype.com/blog/2008/06/movable-type-a-history-of-secu.html" target="_blank">secure alternative</a> to WordPress. It certainly is more secure and has less upgrades to be performed. <span class="misspell">MovableType</span> had some major spam problems traditionally, this might be a drawback though. <span class="misspell">Akismet</span> on WordPress manages spam almost perfectly by now.</li>
<li><strong><a title="Serendipity/S9Y" href="http://www.s9y.org/" target="_blank">Serendipity/S9Y</a></strong><strong>: </strong>S9Y was the <span class="misspell">upstarter</span> when it comes to blog platforms. It&#8217;s relatively new as it hasn&#8217;t been around in the early day of blogging but has a growing community. Some <a id="rduu" title="people in the SEO industry use Serendipity" href="http://www.carlgalloway.com/archives/303-Making-your-s9y-template-work-better-with-SEO-in-mind.html" target="_blank">people in the SEO industry use Serendipity</a> so I&#8217;d be glad to hear their opinion.</li>
<li><strong><a id="q6n7" title="Drupal" href="http://drupal.org/" target="_blank"><span class="misspell">Drupal</span></a></strong>: <span class="misspell">Drupal</span> is <a id="k4xd" title="more than a blog platform" href="http://www.quevin.com/blog/farewell_mt4_hello_drupal_6" target="_blank">more than a blog platform</a> but you can set a blog with it comfortably. Also it has been <a id="w.t_" title="hailed as SEO friendly for ages" href="http://blog.venture-skills.co.uk/2007/02/06/drupal-and-seo-a-good-combination/" target="_blank">hailed as SEO friendly for ages</a>. Some <a id="tj9u" title="pretty" href="http://www.bobdylan.com/" target="_blank">pretty</a> large <a id="x1ek" title="sites" href="http://research.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">sites</a> that are not blogs use <span class="misspell">Drupal</span> too and to be honest I&#8217;ve hear of any problems with <span class="misspell">Drupal</span>.</li>
<li><strong><a id="kkuc" title="B2Evolution" href="http://b2evolution.net/" target="_blank">B2Evolution</a></strong>: This blog platform has been around for ages but never got really popular. It may be name or the lack of character, B2Evolution even attempts to <a id="zezv" title="mimic Wordpress" href="http://demo1.b2evolution.net/stable/blog1.php" target="_blank">mimic Wordpress</a> looks by using the Kubrick theme, but this might be as well an advantage. anyways, just the fact that it&#8217;s around as well as &#8220;alive and kicking&#8221; for a such long time makes it a viable alternative.</li>
<li><strong><a id="cuto" title="Textpattern" href="http://textpattern.com/" target="_blank"><span class="misspell">Textpattern</span></a></strong>: Back when I started blogging it was an easy decision, Wordpress o <span class="misspell">Textpattern</span>. It was a choice like PC vs Mac, the more design oriented bloggers have chosen <span class="misspell">Textpattern</span>. The community seems a little dormant by now but <span class="misspell">Textpattern</span> is still a good choice it seems to me. Also there seem to be quite a lot of <a id="afq8" title="plugins for SEO" href="http://sitening.com/blog/8-essential-plugins-for-textpattern/" target="_blank">plugins for SEO</a>.</li>
<li><strong><a id="b4c-" title="Mephisto" href="http://mephistoblog.com/" target="_blank"><span class="misspell">Mephisto</span></a></strong>: This is a comparably unknown blog platform but if you look at the code, screenshots and and Wordpress-like URLs it looks very promising. Sadly due to lack of funding and only two developers working on it <a id="ggyw" title="Mephisto is stuck" href="http://mephistoblog.com/2007/3/22/is-mephisto-dead" target="_blank"><span class="misspell">Mephisto</span> is stuck</a> at Version 0.8</li>
<li><strong><a id="jrfc" title="Typo" href="http://www.typosphere.org/" target="_blank">Typo</a></strong>: In <a id="p3kg" title="version 5.1" href="http://blog.typosphere.org/2008/07/21/typo-5-1-cartier-bresson-is-out" target="_blank">version 5.1</a> Typo introduced many of the features we&#8217;re accustomed to from Wordpress or <span class="misspell">MovableType</span>. Now it seems to be a really good alternative. Like <span class="misspell">Mephisto</span> the URL structure follows WordPress defaults and the markup looks great.</li>
</ol>
<p>In case you want to build a blog on a more stable and less insecure and hackable platform than WordPress try one of the alternatives above. Of course I haven&#8217;t tried all of them so I&#8217;d like to hear some feedback from you:</p>
<ul>
<li>What are the drawbacks and advantages of your blog platform?</li>
<li>Why is is good for SEO or why not?</li>
<li>What do you miss or why did you dump WordPress or another blog CMS in favor of it?</li>
</ul>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/wordpress-hacked-7-great-self-hosted-blog-platforms-as-wordpress-alternatives-for-seo-business.html">WordPress Hacked? 7 Great Self Hosted Blog Platforms as WordPress Alternatives for SEO &amp; Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/10/wordpress-hacked-7-great-self-hosted-blog-platforms-as-wordpress-alternatives-for-seo-business.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Simple, Effective Tactics to Promote a New Website</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/5-simple-effective-tactics-to-promote-a-new-website.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/5-simple-effective-tactics-to-promote-a-new-website.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glen Allsopp</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[social bookmarking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been building quite a lot of sites recently, both personally and client related. In this time I&#8217;ve observed quite a few strategies that are key to helping a site grow from scratch. Traffic is usually what the success of a website lies on, so you need to know how to build traffic as effectively [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been building quite a lot of sites recently, both personally and client related. In this time I&#8217;ve observed quite a few strategies that are key to helping a site grow from scratch. Traffic is usually what the success of a website lies on, so you need to know how to build traffic as effectively as possible. Luckily, over the last 2 months I&#8217;ve helped launch over 10 sites and quickly drive them to large amounts of relevant traffic and lots of feed subscribers. With this in mind, I wanted to put together a selection of what I&#8217;ve learned; this isn&#8217;t going to be ground-breaking and you might know some of it, but putting them all in one place should make for this useful resource.</p>
<h3>5 Tactics to Use</h3>
<p><strong>1. Utilise MyBlogLog</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve never heard of MyBlogLog (where have you been?) then I&#8217;ll give you a quick run down. Basically, MyBlogLog is a Yahoo owned community based around your blog and its readers. When you sign-up you get to fill out your profile<sup>1</sup> and even register your community<sup>2</sup> which is for readers of your blog to show support. You&#8217;ll notice that any fans of your blog who are already on MBL are likely to register as part of your community. MBL also offer blog statistics, I used to use them a while ago but because of a few issues in the service i.e. some people could appear as Shoemoney when visiting sites, so I lost a bit of trust in them. My favourite part of MyBlogLog is that whenever you visit a site with their &#8216;visitors&#8217; widget&#8217;, your profile is going to be shown<sup>3</sup>. Therefore, it is important to pick a relevant username and a memorable avatar. This is excellent for branding and you&#8217;ll also notice a few people checking out your profile on the site.</p>
<p><img title="mybloglog" src="http://i35.tinypic.com/2zrfc74.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>2. Register on Twitter</strong></p>
<p>About one year ago I wouldn&#8217;t have recommended this, even though the service was around. This is mostly due to the fact that Twitter had quite a varied audience and people didn&#8217;t really think to use it to promote a website. These days however, Twitter is an excellent way to drive traffic to a site and build your name in a niche, especially with their now huge userbase. After you&#8217;ve registered on Twitter<sup>1</sup> make sure you fill out your profile<sup>2</sup> and use the same avatar as MyBlogLog. This is important for branding purposes and it&#8217;s also going to set you out from most users of the site. Note that people are more likely to notice your tweets (status updates) via your picture rather than your username. Once you&#8217;re all set-up you need to start adding people to follow<sup>3</sup> and interact with from the niche of your site. If you are passionate about your niche then the discussions these people are having should interest you. There are multiple ways to find a relevant audience:</p>
<ol>
<li>Look for links to twitter profiles on your favourite blogs</li>
<li>Perform the Google search &#8217;site:twitter.com &#8220;niche&#8221;&#8216;</li>
<li>Import your email contacts when you sign-up</li>
<li>Try a service like <a style="background-color: #ff0000;" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.twittertroll.com/">TwitterTroll</a>, a twitter search engine and look for your main keywords</li>
</ol>
<p>If you want more people to follow you, make sure you put a link to your profile on your blog.  <img title="twitter" src="http://i38.tinypic.com/2nsqr1i.jpg" alt="" /> <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>3. Sign-Up to Gravatar</strong></p>
<p>This one is relatively simple but it is definitely effective for branding and comment traffic. Gravatars are the avatars that show up next to comments on many blogs (this is increasing all the time) and is built by the same team that builds Wordpress. Gravatar works by assigning your email address to a picture, so whenever you post a comment with a certain email, your picture will appear next to it. I&#8217;m very big on branding so I keep this the same as the avatar on Twitter and MyBlogLog. <img title="gravatar" src="http://i36.tinypic.com/20af2xi.jpg" alt="" /> <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>4. Register on StumbleUpon</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Once again with StumbleUpon, I like to keep the branding and avatar theme running so whenever I sign-up or recommend others, I tell them to use either a personal name or site name for their username. Secondly, use the same image that has been used elsewhere as your avatar. Now then, there are 2 things you want to do with your StumbleUpon account: <em>1. Set-up your interests so you can find a lot of relevant content</em> and <em>2. Stumble the blog posts of fellow niche bloggers and let them know about it in their comments</em>For all the bloggers in your niche you find on the site, make sure you add them as a friend. You&#8217;ll typically find they link to their profile on their own blog, or they are always reviewing pages from their own website. When you add them make sure that you send a personal message which includes their name and ask them to add you as a friend. This can be time consuming if there are a lot of SU users in this niche but it is definitely worth the effort. Once you have started to build up your network you can help spread the traffic to others in your niche and even make use of the &#8216;Send-to&#8217; function whenever you write a post of your own. One more thing I do on StumbleUpon is message all the people that thumb-up one of my personal posts. I thank them for taking the time to check out the site and also ask them to do a friend exchange. Once again, this is time consuming but it is a nice personal touch and anything to help increase traffic to your new website is a bonus. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>5. Start Leaving Comments</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>Last but definitely not least in the list is to start leaving comments on other blogs. The follow-up to this post is going to look at all the various ways to find the top sites in a niche, there are more than you would expect. I&#8217;ve watched bloggers like <a href="http://www.writerdad.com/">Sean</a>, <a href="http://www.avani-mehta.com/">Avani</a>, <a href="http://www.somedaysyndrome.com/">Alex</a> and <a href="http://www.attractionmindmap.com/">Evelyn</a> seriously increase traffic and activity on their sites by being very active on the blogs of others.  I recommend commenting on other blogs for a number of reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>Small amount of traffic from the site you comment on</li>
<li>Increase branding &amp; niche exposure (think: gravatar)</li>
<li>Site authors are much more likely to link to your posts</li>
<li>It helps establish a relationship with an author, this can definitely be helpful if you need their assistance in the future</li>
</ul>
<p>As they always say, you can have the greatest content in the world but if you aren&#8217;t active online or promoting your articles in some way then nobody is going to see them. These steps are very simple but can also be very effective to get your brand out there and start promoting your new website.</p>
<h3>Effective?</h3>
<p>I did say these tactics were going to be effective and I keep to my word, think about how all of this interlinks. Whenever you visit a site to leave a comment, you are instantly shown as a visitor on their MyBlogLog widget, just for visiting. Now whenever you leave a comment, besides the traffic you get your avatar is showing next to it if they had gravatars enabled. All your comments and Stumbles are going to be a great way to build up relationships with others which you can leverage for links or promotion help whenever you write a worthy post. When that worthy post is ready, don&#8217;t forget to tweet it ;).</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/5-simple-effective-tactics-to-promote-a-new-website.html">5 Simple, Effective Tactics to Promote a New Website</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/5-simple-effective-tactics-to-promote-a-new-website.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 Ways to Fool Your Competitors Using SpyFu</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/4-ways-fool-your-competitors-using-spyfu.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/4-ways-fool-your-competitors-using-spyfu.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fergie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spyfu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if you could convince your competitors that they had to spend big in order to keep up with you? If they use SpyFu to estimate your ad spend and CPC then you can. I&#8217;ve looked at what SpyFu say about their own algorithm and techniques and then I&#8217;ve combined this knowledge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if you could convince your competitors that they had to spend big in order to keep up with you? If they use SpyFu to estimate your ad spend and CPC then you can. I&#8217;ve looked at what SpyFu say about their own algorithm and techniques and then I&#8217;ve combined this knowledge with <a title="The Small (but Great) SpyFu Experiment" href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/the-small-but-great-spyfu-experiment.html">what I observed last week</a> to come up with these ideas about how to turn SpyFu into a double agent.</p>
<p>Firstly let&#8217;s look at how SpyFu calculate their Ad Spend and CPC estimates. Then I&#8217;ll show you how to use this knowledge to increase SpyFu&#8217;s estimates of your Ad Spend and CPC without spending any more money.</p>
<p><strong>How Does SpyFu Estimate Daily Ad Spend?</strong><br />
The onsite help, also available in <a href="http://www.velocityscape.com/Download/SpyFuInstructionManual.doc">The SpyFu Instruction Manual</a> says this about calculating Daily Ad Spend:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>When we calculate Daily Ad Budget, we start with all the keywords that we have seen a domain advertise on. We eliminate overlapping keywords. For example, “race cars”, “luxury cars”, and “cars” becomes “cars”. Then, we take into account the current and historical positions that we have seen the domain’s ad appear for each given keyword. Based on the position of each ad, we estimate the price that the domain likely pays for the keyword. Basically, we then add up all the custom individual keyword costs per day and we arrive at the Daily Ad Budget.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Let’s add in what we already know about SpyFu to our new knowledge from the above passage:</p>
<ul>
<li>SpyFu uses its web scraping database to get a list of all the keywords a site advertises on.</li>
<li> Overlapping keywords are eliminated.</li>
<li> A daily cost is estimated for each keyword given its ad position.</li>
<li> The total can then be easily found.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll look at this step by step:</p>
<p><strong>Web Scraping: Reading the Internet</strong><br />
Velocityscape (who own SpyFu) have a massive web scraped database. If your ad appears on one of the first few SERPs for a term then they will know about it and have a record of it, unless the term is relatively unusual.  This is why estimates are better for accounts with a large number of impressions; such accounts either bid on lots of relatively common terms that will be scraped by SpyFu or they bid on a few very general terms which are also covered. Accounts that bid on lots of low traffic, long tail keywords might not get picked up at this stage so SpyFu will not have very good data on them.</p>
<p><strong>Ignoring the Long Tail</strong><br />
The example that SpyFu gives for eliminating overlapping keywords is clearly far too restrictive; I doubt they would lump &#8220;race cars&#8221; and &#8220;luxury cars&#8221; into &#8220;cars&#8221; but you rarely see three word keywords whilst using SpyFu and, personally, I&#8217;ve never seen a four word one. Accounts which bid mainly on long tail keywords will have lower impressions and a lower daily ad spend but SpyFu does not take this into account, ignoring the long tail and lumping everything into a more general query.</p>
<p><strong>Counting the Cost</strong><br />
The accuracy of the daily cost estimate for each keyword is a tricky one. If they work it out by considering an average CPC for each keyword multiplied by an estimated number of clicks then their accuracy depends not only on their CPC estimates (see below) but also their estimates of CTR’s. Since all this is done by a computer CTR estimates will depend only on ad position and not on the ad copy which the folks at <a href="http://blog.mindvalleylabs.com">the Mind Valley Labs</a> tell us can make a massive difference.</p>
<p><strong>What About CPC?</strong><br />
I&#8217;ve just said that the Daily Ad Spend estimate depends on the accuracy of the CPC estimate. So if you can manipulate what SpyFu thinks about your CPC then you can manipulate their Daily Ad Spend estimate as well. So how does SpyFu estimate CPC?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>If you take the Average Cost per Click of every keyword that a domain advertises on, add them all up, and divide by the total number of keywords, you will have the Avg Cost/Click for a domain. For example, if a domain advertises on 3 keywords with Avg Cost/Clicks of $1, $2, and $3, respectively then the Avg Cost per Click for the domain would be $2.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This is clearly a load of rubbish. The following table shows that SpyFu’s method only gives the correct answer if there is the same number of clicks for each keyword:</p>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="collapse;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Term 1</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Term 2</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Term 3</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.8pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Totals</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Avg CPC</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">1</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">2</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">3</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.8pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Number of   Clicks</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">1</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">1</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">1</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.8pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">3</span></em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Total Cost</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">1</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">2</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">3</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.8pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">6</span></em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Now look at the table if each keyword gets a different number of clicks:</p>
<table class="MsoTableGrid" style="collapse;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Term 1</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Term 2</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Term 3</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.8pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Totals</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Avg CPC</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">1</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">2</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">3</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.8pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;"> </span></em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Number of   Clicks</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">2</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">2</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">5</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.8pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">9</span></em></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">Total Cost</span></em></strong></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">2</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">4</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.75pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">15</span></em></p>
</td>
<td style="95.8pt;" width="128" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="normal;"><em><span style="&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;">21</span></em></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>In this case the average CPC is 21/9=2.33 not 2 as SpyFu’s method tells us.</p>
<p>At $70/month for a subscription I hope that SpyFu doesn&#8217;t really estimate CPC in this way.</p>
<p>Assuming the SpyFu algorithm does actually estimate CPC in this way then their estimate will be most accurate when the standard deviation in the number of clicks for each keyword in an account is small. As we have seen the method gives the right answer in the case where all keywords receive the same number of clicks, it also wouldn’t be far off if the number of clicks was dominated by a few keywords.</p>
<p><strong>Estimates for Individual Keywords</strong><br />
Of course, all this depends on the accuracy of their estimates of average CPC for each keyword but to say any keyword has an average CPC ignores one of the most fundamental parts of AdWords.  No one can accurately predict the CPC for an ad without knowing how the quality score system works. I’m sure SpyFu has the technology and capacity to scrape landing pages as well as search results; they can then apply their own quality score algorithm but I can’t imagine their results are very accurate.</p>
<p>The AdWords API has a <a href="http://www.google.com/apis/adwords/developer/TrafficEstimatorService.html">service that will estimate CPC</a> for a given keyword but I doubt SpyFu use it: The API service is designed to be accurate when it can access campaign and ad group quality scores for the account it is being used for; this information will not be available for SpyFu.</p>
<p><strong>Get on With It!</strong><br />
Enough waffle. Now we&#8217;ve looked at how SpyFu&#8217;s estimates are calculated lets look at what you can do to change them, without actually changing you account of course. None of these methods have been tested and some of them require information that I don&#8217;t know, but if what SpyFu says about itself is true then at least the first two of these methods should work.</p>
<p><strong>Bid High</strong><br />
SpyFu do not know what your click through rates are. They calculate daily spend on an estimated daily spend for a given keyword which is probably based on an average CTR depending on the ad position. So if you use a high traffic keyword with and bid enough that your ad gets a good position then SpyFu think you are spending a lot of money. But what if your ad text was so bland that the real CTR was incredibly low? Then you&#8217;d be spending a lot less than SpyFu thought.</p>
<p><strong>Bid on the Long Tail</strong><br />
Bid on the long tail of a really expensive keyword. SpyFu even published a <a title="SpyFu's Top List" href="http://www.spyfu.com/TopList.aspx?listId=3">list of the most expensive keywords</a> to make this easier for you. The idea here is to use the way SpyFu lumps long tail searches together in order to convince them that your CPC is huge. For example top of their top list is &#8220;conference calling companies&#8221; at $52 a pop. As I&#8217;ve said, I&#8217;ve never seen a four word keyword in SpyFu so try bidding on something like &#8220;free conference calling companies.&#8221; The term &#8220;free&#8221; is common enough that SpyFu will probably scrape for it so their algorithm should record you bidding on &#8220;conference calling companies&#8221; but your actual CPC will be lower because people will bid less for the word &#8220;free.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course the algorithm might decide to cut your keyword down to &#8220;free conference calling&#8221; instead so you should bid on a variety of &#8220;x conference calling companies&#8221; to make sure your long tail is shortened to the keywords with the maximum CPC.</p>
<p><strong>Bid at the Right Time</strong><br />
SpyFu&#8217;s database is not updated very frequently. Most things I&#8217;ve read say it&#8217;s only redone every 60-90 days. Spend a lot when SpyFu does its update and you&#8217;ll appear to be spending that much for the next three months. Take these update figures with a pinch of salt; I can&#8217;t find anything official about this and quite a few blog posts about SpyFu appear <a href="http://www.nowpublic.com/technology/keywordspy-vs-spyfu">quite biased</a> against it.</p>
<p>When is SpyFu&#8217;s next database update due? I don&#8217;t know. It is also possible that their data gathering goes on all the time but they only do their calculations every three months. If this is the case then this method won&#8217;t work. Unfortunately I think this probably is the case.</p>
<p><strong>Bid on the Right Place</strong><br />
SpyFu&#8217;s owners, Velocityscape are based in Phoenix, Arizona. Assuming their scraping is all done from there then a high spend ad group targeted at their location will be scraped and analysed by them as if it covers the whole web. Unfortunately things are unlikely to be that simple.</p>
<p>I doubt the whole of Velocityscape&#8217;s scraping operations are centralised; SpyFu UK would indicate that they have at least one other location. This is not a big barrier, campaigns can be targeted at more than one location but if they scrape using something like the AdWords Ad Preview Tool this method won&#8217;t work at all. Does anyone know anything about this?</p>
<p><strong>Control the Double Agent</strong><br />
Always remember that SpyFu works both ways; while you&#8217;re using it to spy on your competitors, they are using it to spy on you. But also remember that you have complete control over what information SpyFu can gather about you and, to a certain extent, you can manipulate that information.</p>
<p>It would be an interesting challenge to see who can get the highest estimated daily ad spend for the lowest actual budget. Let the games begin!</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/4-ways-fool-your-competitors-using-spyfu.html">4 Ways to Fool Your Competitors Using SpyFu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/4-ways-fool-your-competitors-using-spyfu.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 Blog Post Ideas for Business Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/50-blog-post-ideas-for-business-blogging.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/50-blog-post-ideas-for-business-blogging.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Business blogging is not always easy.
A business blog is subjective but unlike a private blog you still are writing for people interested in your trade, products and services and not necessarily you as a person watching movies and eating out.
You can&#8217;t annoy people too much, you can&#8217;t be too

 personal
 funny
 outspoken

So you need ideas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Business blogging is not always easy</em>.</p>
<p>A business blog is subjective but unlike a private blog you still are writing for people interested in your trade, products and services and not necessarily you as a person watching movies and eating out.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t annoy people too much, you can&#8217;t be too</p>
<ul>
<li> personal</li>
<li> funny</li>
<li> outspoken</li>
</ul>
<p>So you need ideas that are creative while not being too creative as to scare away your business audience.</p>
<p>To assist you I collected a <strong>list of 50 blog post ideas for business blogging for any industry</strong>. You can apply it in most niches I think. Some of these ideas are the bomb and will bring you publicity and popularity while others focus on highlighting your expertise or are part of a social networking strategy. Some of the post ideas are all of these at once.</p>
<ol>
<li> Envision <a id="r5-i" title="the future of your industry" href="../2008/09/quo-vadis-seo-has-5-futures.html">the future of your industry</a> by extrapolating the current developments</li>
<li> Explain why everybody should care for your trade and not only specialists</li>
<li> Make a list of famous people who deal or dealt with issues related to your business</li>
<li> List 30 or more online resources for business people in your industry</li>
<li> Review a publication dealing with your industry</li>
<li> Make a list of the top myths in your industry and debunk them</li>
<li> Disagree with a high level personality in your business, prove her or him wrong</li>
<li> Make a list of the top 10 blogs in your niche</li>
<li> Report from a trade fair</li>
<li> Compare the your national market to markets abroad</li>
<li> Collect the best blog postings in your niche and compile a best of-list</li>
<li> Expand your focus to a similar area of expertise by comparing</li>
<li> Write down a code of ethics for your blog and your business as a whole</li>
<li> Explore and depict a niche social media platform for your trade, if there is none use a forum to do that</li>
<li> Add a forum to your blog or site if your site has a big enough community to sustain it</li>
<li> Break the rules of your trade by remodeling them and adapting to current situation, write about it</li>
<li> Go off topic and link a topic from everyday life back to your business &#8220;10 Ways SEO is like Base-Jumping&#8221;</li>
<li> Make a list of WordPress plugins that are most useful for your industry &#8220;The 10 Best WordPress plugins for Graphic Designers&#8221;</li>
<li> Reach out to your clients and fans: &#8220;What would you like to change in [insert your product or service here]?&#8221;</li>
<li> Display attractive images of your products, several of them, in the best case your own products</li>
<li> Analyze the current climate in your industry and explain the ramifications</li>
<li> Identify leaders in your area and ask them to guest post on your blog or write for their blog instead</li>
<li> Show what went wrong in your company, why and how you dealt with it, learning from mistakes is very helpful for others</li>
<li> Compare the new vs the old ways of doing your buisness</li>
<li> Highlight top female bloggers or experts in your trade</li>
<li> Create fictional and visionary product description</li>
<li> Satirize a very well known personality, be it of your trade or outside of it</li>
<li> Write an allegory about your idol doing your business like &#8220;The Bruce Lee Method of Business Blogging&#8221;</li>
<li> Thank your 10 favorite readers and/or commenters</li>
<li> Expose a scam in your industry (make sure to consult a lawyer in advance)</li>
<li> Take a big brand (or several) and use it as an example for best practices vs mistakes</li>
<li> Use humor to lighten up a boring topic &#8220;I Can Haz Pay Per Cat? The Lolcats Way of PPC&#8221;</li>
<li> Explain the local advantages of your company, do not hide behind modesty: &#8220;Oxford: SEO since 1542&#8243;</li>
<li> Review a book dealing with your topic that really displays thinking outside the box</li>
<li> Combine your topic with another one, usually but wrongfully not combined with yours, like SEO and graphic design</li>
<li>Express your own personal view an a highly debatable issue and do not just repeat common ground opinions</li>
<li>Make a short movie to show on your blog, this can be something funny or just simply you speaking</li>
<li>Create a list of indispensable software or web tools for your job</li>
<li>Take a common issue many people care about and explain how it relates to your business</li>
<li>Introduce a new business model in your trade or better, several of them</li>
<li>Be the first to break news, for instance reveal your new product via the blog</li>
<li>Check your search engine referers and write postings for those queries that had no matches until now</li>
<li>Check in your stats which post is the most popular one and write a follow up</li>
<li>Join a trade organization and explain why you did it</li>
<li>Make a donation to a good cause and blog about it</li>
<li>Introduce the 10 most promising bloggers in your industry</li>
<li>Check Digg, StumbleUpon or Technorati to find out what&#8217;s most popular right now and find a new angle to it</li>
<li>Engage in a discussion on a forum and reprint on your blog</li>
<li>Ask people on Twitter a question and blog the best replies</li>
<li>Make a list of blogging ideas specifically for your industry</li>
</ol>
<p><em>Remember that business blogging is about value.</em> That&#8217;s indeed the most crucial difference between private and business blogs. In private blogs people want to express themselves, business bloggers want to create value for others. So while writing a post for a business blog always consider this question: Of what use can this article be to potential clients, people in my industry and the general public?&#8221;</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/50-blog-post-ideas-for-business-blogging.html">50 Blog Post Ideas for Business Blogging</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/50-blog-post-ideas-for-business-blogging.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Spin Thing: Wrinkle cream and SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/a-spin-thing-wrinkle-cream-and-seo.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/a-spin-thing-wrinkle-cream-and-seo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Barrass</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went for a drink with a friend of mine recently and she was telling me about an anti-wrinkle cream she had bought (I will not be naming her, she&#8217;d kill me!) which turned out to do nothing for wrinkles.
She had invested in Johnson &#038; Johnson&#8217;s Complete Lift cream, only to have the Advertising Standards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went for a drink with a friend of mine recently and she was telling me about an anti-wrinkle cream she had bought (I will not be naming her, she&#8217;d kill me!) which turned out to do nothing for wrinkles.</p>
<p>She had invested in Johnson &#038; Johnson&#8217;s Complete Lift cream, only to have the Advertising Standards Agency ban its advertising a few days later for being &#8220;misleading&#8221;.</p>
<p>The watchdog was responding to complaints by the public that the £17.99 50 ml pot contained small print which stated it offered &#8220;no physical lift&#8221;.</p>
<p>Despite this, my anonymous friend said she is going to keep using it &#8220;just in case&#8221; because it can&#8217;t hurt to hope.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t want you to think that I spend my spare time obsessing over search engine optimisation (SEO), so let&#8217;s say I began thinking about spin, skin and search the next day.</p>
<p>A variety of studies and advertising bans have debunked most of the anti-wrinkle creams on the market as being pretty ineffective when it comes to turning back the clock.</p>
<p>Good for the skin they may be but none can simply smooth away wrinkles yet an astounding number of people buy them anyway.</p>
<p>Now, SEO works. Not for wrinkles, obviously, I mean in its own field it works. As a marketing technique, it increases targeted traffic, raises visibility and enhances the status of brands.</p>
<p>Despite this, optimisation has a <i>terrible</i> reputation. </p>
<p>If the public know about SEO at all, they often think of that terrible word &#8220;manipulation&#8221;. </p>
<p>SEO is often thought of as entirely black hat, a way of subjugating the usual search engine quality controls in order to present the searcher with marketing copy and nothing useful.</p>
<p>This is so unfair! How come a product which admits on its own packaging that it does not do what you hope it does, continues to sell in the thousands but there are businesses out there which are not investing in search marketing and optimisation?</p>
<p>I think there will always be great spin on some products and enthusiastic consumers to buy them, meaning wrinkle cream will not stop selling. </p>
<p>However, I like to think that SEO will lose its negative reputation and become recognised as the positive, consumer-friendly marketing tactic it is as increasing firms enjoy the great results it offers.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/a-spin-thing-wrinkle-cream-and-seo.html">A Spin Thing: Wrinkle cream and SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/a-spin-thing-wrinkle-cream-and-seo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Quality Score Transparency Great for Advertisers</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/are-google-being-more-open-about-quality-scores.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/are-google-being-more-open-about-quality-scores.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fergie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[google adwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[quality score]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was doing some keyword maintenance today and noticed something new when I hovered over the magnifying glass tool beside a keyword:

It looks like Google are being more explicit with their quality scores. I haven&#8217;t noticed this before but rather than being an accidental leak this time it&#8217;s been integrated into Google&#8217;s changes to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNoSpacing">I was doing some keyword maintenance today and noticed something new when I hovered over the magnifying glass tool beside a keyword:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://seoptimise.com/images/qualityscore.PNG" alt="" width="507" height="210" /></p>
<p>It looks like Google are being more explicit with their quality scores. I haven&#8217;t noticed this before but rather than being an <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-leaks-quality-score-variables-pscore-mcpc-and-thresh-in-search-results/6801/">accidental leak</a> this time it&#8217;s been <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/018253.html">integrated</a> into Google&#8217;s changes to <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/09/quality-score-improvements-to-go-live.html">make quality score more transparent</a>.</p>
<p>I’m not sure how much this will change advertiser behaviour. Perhaps knowing that a keyword is nearly &#8220;Ok&#8221; will encourage people to optimise their landing pages and ad descriptions further, rather than just pausing.</p>
<p>More information is also given for keywords with poor quality scores:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/qualityscorepoor.PNG" alt="" width="324" height="171" /></p>
<p>In this case we are told that no ad will be run on broad match, but that the ad can be triggered on a phrase match.</p>
<p>How will this new information affect the way you run your AdWords campaigns?</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/are-google-being-more-open-about-quality-scores.html">Google Quality Score Transparency Great for Advertisers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/are-google-being-more-open-about-quality-scores.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Asda, Tesco &#038; Sainsburys Missing an SEO Opportunity?</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/are-uk-supermarket-retailers-too-big-for-seo.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/are-uk-supermarket-retailers-too-big-for-seo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Gibbons</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today I wrote a blog post over on e-consultancy which looks at how UK supermarkets are ignoring SEO for major keywords, most notably &#8220;supermarket&#8221;.
In my opinion this is a massive oversight and it appears that the leading supermarket retailers such as Asda, Sainsburys and to a certain extent Tesco are trying to overprotect their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today I wrote a blog post over on e-consultancy which looks at how <a href="http://www.e-consultancy.com/news-blog/366383/supermarkets-ignoring-seo-for-major-keywords.html">UK supermarkets are ignoring SEO for major keywords</a>, most notably &#8220;supermarket&#8221;.</p>
<p>In my opinion this is a massive oversight and it appears that the leading supermarket retailers such as Asda, Sainsburys and to a certain extent Tesco are trying to overprotect their brand rather than optimise their website&#8217;s for very important keywords. </p>
<p>As outlined in the article, I&#8217;m not suggesting that they keyword stuff their h1 and title tags etc. But by emphasising terms such as &#8220;supermarket&#8221; they are clearly describing the website to users/customers and helping to generate very valuable targeted search engine traffic.</p>
<p>What do you think, are the supermarkets missing a trick when it comes to SEO?</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/are-uk-supermarket-retailers-too-big-for-seo.html">Are Asda, Tesco &#038; Sainsburys Missing an SEO Opportunity?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/are-uk-supermarket-retailers-too-big-for-seo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Small (but Great) SpyFu Experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/the-small-but-great-spyfu-experiment.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/the-small-but-great-spyfu-experiment.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fergie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spyfu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you not in the loop, spyfu.com is a web service that provides information on who is bidding on what keywords as well as further information on competitors’ daily ad spend as well as their average CPC. The startup squad have a great article on what spyfu does and how it does it.

No [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNoSpacing">For those of you not in the loop, <a href="http://spyfu.com">spyfu.com</a> is a web service that provides information on who is bidding on what keywords as well as further information on competitors’ daily ad spend as well as their average CPC. The startup squad have a great article on <a href="http://startupsquad.com/2006/12/01/spyfu-spy-on-your-competitors-ad-budget/">what spyfu does and how it does it</a>.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>No Mr Bond, I Expect you to Disagree.</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">Everyone seems to have an opinion on how useful spyfu is, ranging from the standard “it works/doesn’t work for me” to the commonly held belief that it is only really useful for large accounts. People disagreeing on the Internet? It’s time to try science!</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>The Experiment</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">I selected 20 of SEOptimise’s clients, discarded two of them for using foreign currencies (spyfu has a UK and US version but I didn’t want the hassle of fiddling with exchange rates) then ignored a further two when spyfu provided no data on them. I then compared the percentage accuracy for SpyFu’s estimates for daily ad spend and CPC with the actual daily spend and average CPC as well as the number of impressions the ad generates. I even drew graphs.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>The Perils of Percentages</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">I decided to work with percentages rather than actual pounds and pence for two reasons; client confidentiality and because there is such a massive variation in budgets and CPC’s across the selected accounts. Considering percentage variations means that a £10 error on an account spending £1000/day counts less than for one on a spend of £10/day. But you knew that already, didn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">One side effect of this is that, particularly on a graph, it looks like the lower estimates are a lot more accurate then the upper estimates. However, this is because the lower estimate is never less than zero so it can never be more than 100% different from the actual value.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">Enough writing. Time for some pictures.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>Bigger is Better?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">With a bigger account, spyfu has more data so its estimates will be more accurate. Right?</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">This first graph is of the error in spyfu’s ad spend estimates against total ad spend. I expected that the error would be less for big spending accounts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/ErrorInAdSpendvsAdSpend.PNG"><img src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/ErrorInAdSpendvsAdSpend.PNG" alt="A Graph of Ad Spend Error against Total Ad Spend. Three interpretations are given below" width="500" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">As you can see, it looks like my hypothesis is correct (at least for the upper estimate, which tends to dominate these charts) but then the error increases again for the account with the largest ad spend. There are three possibilities here:</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="-18pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span><span>1.<span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->Accuracy is unrelated to ad spend.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="-18pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span><span>2.<span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->Accuracy increases with ad spend and the last result is just a freak</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="-18pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span><span>3.<span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->Spyfu is actually most accurate somewhere in the middle range of ad spends.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">To me, option 3 seems the most unrealistic and option 2 the most likely. Let&#8217;s check by looking at CPC. . .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/ErrorInCPCvsAdSpend.PNG"><img src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/ErrorInCPCvsAdSpend.PNG" alt="A Graph of CPC Error against AD Spend. No correlation at all" width="500" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">O dear, this graph of CPC error against total ad spend shows no correlation of any sort whatsoever.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>You’re Using the Wrong Big</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">Ok, so it might be unfair to say an account is big just because it spends a lot of money. Spyfu uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping">web scraping</a> so it should be more accurate for account with a large number of impressions.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">The following graph shows the percentage error ad spend against the number of impressions the account has generated:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/ErrorInAdSpendvsImpressions.PNG"><img src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/ErrorInAdSpendvsImpressions.PNG" alt="A Graph of Ad Spend Error against Impressions. Again, there might be a weak correlation" width="500" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">This graph looks very similar to the Ad Spend Error vs. Ad Spend graph, probably because daily ad spend is quite closely linked to the number of impressions an account gets.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">The graph of CPC error against number of impressions, below, also doesn’t show any correlations.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/ErrorInCPCvsImpressions.PNG"><img src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/ErrorInCPCvsImpressions.PNG" alt="A Graph of CPC Error against Impressions. Again, no correlations." width="500" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">The graphs so far, particularly for CPC show that there is not a strong relationship between the size of an account and the accuracy of spyfu.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">Assuming our largest account is just an anomalous result I think there is a case for saying that estimates of daily ad spend are more accurate for the larger accounts but that the error in CPC does not improve (or get worse) as account size increases.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">Spyfu’s algorithm is a bit of a mystery, perhaps it calculates CPC entirely separately from daily ad spend. Perhaps comparing CPC with the size of the account is like comparing apples and pears.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>Comparing Apples and Apples</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">Now let’s look at graphs for the CPC error against actual CPC:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/CPCErrorvsCPC.PNG"><img src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/CPCErrorvsCPC.PNG" alt="A Graph of CPC Error against CPC. The accuracy of the upper estimate improves as actual CPC increases " width="500" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">My goodness, there might even be a trend there. It looks as though the upper estimate gets more accurate as CPC increases. The account with the highest CPC is an anomaly since spyfu has given both a lower and upper estimate of 0; any PPC marketer with common sense would ignore this anyway.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">This next graph shows the same information, but with the upper estimate plot removed so that it is easier to spot trends in the lower estimate:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/CPCErrorvsCPC(2).PNG"><img src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/CPCErrorvsCPC(2).PNG" alt="The Error in the lower estimate for CPC graphed against Actual CPC. The estimate gets worse as CPC increases" width="500" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So as CPC increases the lower estimate actually gets worse. This is all very confusing, what does it all mean?</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>What’s Going On?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">So far the results seem to indicate the following:</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="-18pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span><span>1.<span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->Spyfu’s estimate of ad spend is more accurate for larger accounts whether size is measured by ad spend or number of impressions.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="-18pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span><span>2.<span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->The accuracy of the CPC estimate does not depend on the account size.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="-18pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span><span>3.<span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->The upper estimate for CPC improves as CPC increase, but…</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="-18pt;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span><span>4.<span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><!--[endif]-->The lower CPC estimate gets worse as CPC increases.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>What Does This Tell Me?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">Nothing at all. The sample size is small and the correlations are weak; you would be a fool to use this data to decide how accurate spyfu is. Besides, it’s not like the four conclusions written above are even quantitative. It would’ve been much more useful if I’d been able to say “The lower estimate of ad spend for an account is within 50% of the actual value 90% of the time” but as you have seen the results do not support anything like that. The best I can hope for is that someone will be intrigued by what they’ve seen here and decide to test clients from their own MCC. If they have more data, or if lots of people with not much data arrive at the same conclusions then perhaps I can say I was onto something.</p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">
<p class="MsoNoSpacing"><strong>So SpyFu is Useless?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing">Far from it. When it provided information, true ad spend was within spyfu’s estimates 71% of the time (ignoring the accounts for which it returned 0) with CPC being slightly better at 79%. I will continue to advise and act as if true ad spend and CPC lie within spyfu’s estimates because the information it provides is better than no information at all.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/the-small-but-great-spyfu-experiment.html">The Small (but Great) SpyFu Experiment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/the-small-but-great-spyfu-experiment.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contentious Search: Google, Religion and Freedom of Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/contentious-search-google-religion-and-freedom-of-speech.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/contentious-search-google-religion-and-freedom-of-speech.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Tofts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has reversed a decision which saw it previously refuse to carry paid search adverts for a pro-life Christian group when the searcher types in &#8220;abortion&#8221;.
The Christian Institute, the group in question, (which must have received greater levels of traffic over this event than it ever has before because of this story) approached the search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has reversed a decision which saw it previously refuse to carry paid search adverts for a pro-life Christian group when the searcher types in &#8220;abortion&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Christian Institute, the group in question, (which must have received greater levels of traffic over this event than it ever has before because of this story) approached the search engine earlier this year requesting paid adspace.</p>
<p>Google refused, on the grounds that its policy on paid search advertising prevents it from mixing religion and abortion content.</p>
<p>Tricky. The group responded by asserting its free speech rights had been affected, noting that the search engine allowed advertising from abortion clinics and pro-choice websites which criticised religion.</p>
<p>Now Google has agreed to display these adverts, pledging to allow a &#8220;level playing field&#8221;.</p>
<p>A spokesperson said: &#8220;The issue of abortion is an emotive subject and Google does not take a particular side.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whatever your opinions on abortion or indeed any contentious issue, the search engine must exercise some editorial control regarding contentious subjects in order to protect its reputation.</p>
<p>To pick an extreme example, it could not place an advert for the BNP without provoking a storm of criticism (for our US readers, the BNP is a far right UK political party). Having said that, I have never seen a political advert, though, so perhaps it is avoiding politics altogether.</p>
<p>Then I began to ponder what contentious issues Google <em>would</em> carry adverts for. A search for &#8220;personality test&#8221; did not throw up any paid search results for the Scientologists.</p>
<p>However, a search for &#8220;scientology&#8221; or &#8220;L Ron Hubbard&#8221; brings up sponsored links for the religion many people consider to be a dangerous cult.</p>
<p>To be fair to Google, if it were to decide on a moral code and impose that upon its paid ads, it would be essentially forcing those principles upon the millions of people using its service.</p>
<p>It might seem fine to me to ban certain subjects from receiving additional visibility, but then many people could disagree. It would be problematic, maybe even downright <em>wrong</em> for the engine to inflict its views on people, even if the alternative is to give page time to contentious areas.</p>
<p>Currently, there are demonstrations against Google and Microsoft <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gC3-jPCdhj1kh9Q0qjFG2U7IdD8A" target="_blank">taking place in India</a>.</p>
<p>This is because they have been carrying paid ads for tests which claim to inform expectant mothers what sex their unborn babies are, although they have both now ceased to do so.</p>
<p>India has issues with female babies being terminated and has outlawed products which purport to tell the parent what gender they are carrying.</p>
<p>How difficult must it be for a company this big to keep on top of local moral stance and law? Yet clearly it must do so - its corporate reputation would be harmed if it encouraged locally illegal behaviour - imagine if a search engine began advertising rabbit guns to British teens!</p>
<p>It is not just search portals that can be accused of bad practice. Earlier this year, Justin Williams, the assistant editor of the Telegraph Media Group, slammed the Guardian for buying sponsored links for the keywords &#8220;Madeleine McCann&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is no phrase too sensitive, no taste that is too poor &#8230; apparently,&#8221; he sneered.</p>
<p>Where an organisation buys its adspace can clearly affect its reputation, just as it could potentially harm the search engine or website displaying the promotion.</p>
<p>I think what interests me about the entire debate is that these are issues few people could have predicted in the early stages of search. It makes me wonder how Google, or any organisation which publishes advertising, will retain its moral stance when ethics are personal and localised but the internet has no borders.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/contentious-search-google-religion-and-freedom-of-speech.html">Contentious Search: Google, Religion and Freedom of Speech</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/contentious-search-google-religion-and-freedom-of-speech.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quo Vadis: SEO Has 5 Futures</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/quo-vadis-seo-has-5-futures.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/quo-vadis-seo-has-5-futures.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[blog meme]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advanced seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[findability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web design for ROI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly the future of SEO is mostly a topic for people outside the industry who grab attention by reinforcing prejudice. On the other hand we&#8217;re in the middle of huge changes taking place in the SEO industry or should I say&#8230; yes, what.
Already at present we rarely speak about SEO anymore. It&#8217;s always part of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly <strong><a id="fqi1" title="the future of SEO" href="../2008/05/no-future-seos-not-dead-seo-pistols-sell-365-more-tickets-by-2012.html">the future of SEO</a></strong> is mostly a topic for people outside the industry who grab attention by reinforcing prejudice. On the other hand we&#8217;re in the middle of <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/25-outdated-seo-terms-tactics-vs-their-modern-alternatives.html">huge changes taking place</a> in the SEO industry or should I say&#8230; yes, what.</p>
<p>Already at present we rarely speak about SEO anymore. It&#8217;s always part of a composite term or a larger concept like <em>search marketing</em>. Here are the 5 most common SEO futures already visible right now:</p>
<ol>
<li>findability</li>
<li>advanced SEO</li>
<li>SEO 2.0</li>
<li>web design for ROI</li>
<li>search marketing</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><br />
Findability</strong><br />
Findability is a concept stemming rather from the <a title="web development community" href="http://alistapart.com/articles/findabilityorphan" target="_blank">web development community</a> and usability experts. It&#8217;s almost all encompassing and covers not only SEO aspects of web design. It also reflects off site factors and new developments like social media. It&#8217;s been revived recently but it didn&#8217;t catch on as much as I&#8217;d expect yet. Findability is a great term for all those who struggle to explain SEO again and again. Findability is kind of self-explanatory due to the non-acronym nature of the term.</p>
<p><strong>Advanced SEO</strong><br />
Advanced SEO has been highly debated recently and then it seemingly disappeared from the daily buzz. Is advanced the new better SEO or just a part of it like basic SEO? <a id="g7is" title="I don't know" href="http://seo2.0.onreact.com/what-is-advanced-seo" target="_blank">I don&#8217;t know</a>, the pundits do not even agree on what advanced SEO really is. It certainly has something to do with programming and web analytics, examples like &#8220;ip delivery&#8221; and &#8220;ROI analysis&#8221; get mentioned in this context. Some bloggers dispute that advanced SEO is another term for &#8220;black hat SEO&#8221; but there has been no final agreement reached on this.</p>
<p><strong>SEO 2.0 </strong><br />
SEO 2.0 has almost gone main stream when Lee Odden coined it&#8217;s most popular <a id="qokz" title="definition of &quot;digital asset optimization&quot;" href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2007/06/digital-asset-optimization/" target="_blank">definition of &#8220;digital asset optimization&#8221;</a> in 2007. Others have come up with numerous other definitions. Then the talk of the town kind of subsided partly due to the growing wariness of everything &#8220;2.0&#8243; and corresponding buzzwords. It seems that SEO 2.0 is not only SEO for Web 2.0 but a holistic new approach highlighting social media engagement and techniques like link baiting, reputation management as well as viral marketing. It hasn&#8217;t really gone main stream yet though in spite of many SEO specialists already adopting it.</p>
<p><strong>Web Design for ROI</strong><br />
<a id="nmsh" title="Web Design for ROI" href="http://www.wd4roi.com/" target="_blank">Web Design for ROI</a> is a highly <a id="p_fx" title="influential" href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/web-design-for-roi-chapters-1-and-2" target="_blank">influential</a> <a id="bt7q" title="book" href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/web-design-for-roi-chapter-3-managing-for-roi" target="_blank">book</a> that basically, like the findability concept, <a id="vqui" title="re-contextualizes SEO" href="http://www.slideshare.net/aquentweb/web-design-for-roi" target="_blank">re-contextualizes SEO</a> along the lines of larger business objectives. These get translated via web design and information architecture in order to realign them in favor of higher returns instead of &#8220;good looks&#8221;. While it&#8217;s not a term that realy caught on it really describes what SEO nowadays is about. PageRank, rankings and traffic are not enough as return on investment is key. The concept is already widely accepted and I&#8217;d love people to use a short version of the term like ROI design or something. They do not yet though.</p>
<p><strong>Search Marketing</strong><br />
SEO and SEM are intertwined for a few years. some people even define SEO as a sub-discipline of SEM. While I prefer SEM to refer to paid search (PPC etc.) the term has morphed to search marketing recently. You rarely say &#8220;SEM&#8221; by now. Not only the term gained traction, the approach did too. Search marketing dropped the &#8220;engine&#8221; as it&#8217;s about reaching out to people who search, be it on search engines, static websites (Adsense!) or social media. You don&#8217;t need strictly an engine to search. You need a search marketer to help you perform on the various media and platforms though. This term ist the most popular right now as describing the whole industry.</p>
<p>These are possible ways that you can take. <strong>SEO in a way branches </strong><strong>out </strong><strong>in many directions</strong>. You can choose which one you&#8217;ll take. Also the 5 new SEO paradigms overlap and are used sometimes as synonyms. <em>Which way do you go? Quo vadis SEO?</em></p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/quo-vadis-seo-has-5-futures.html">Quo Vadis: SEO Has 5 Futures</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/quo-vadis-seo-has-5-futures.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search not squeezed by global slump</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/search-not-squeezed-by-global-slump.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/search-not-squeezed-by-global-slump.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Tofts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seoptimise]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have noticed that, while Britain&#8217;s investment bankers may be facing a lean Christmas, SEOptimise has expanded its team. This is because, despite the credit squeeze, the search sector is growing rapidly.
Recession, it seems, happens to other industries - the rise in search marketing budgets is so inevitable that even with a slow or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that, while Britain&#8217;s investment bankers may be facing a lean Christmas, <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/seoptimise-continues-to-grow-with-two-new-staff-members.html">SEOptimise has expanded its team</a>. This is because, despite the credit squeeze, the search sector is growing rapidly.</p>
<p>Recession, it seems, happens to other industries - the rise in <a title="Search Marketing" href="http://www.seoptimise.com" target="_self">search marketing</a> budgets is so inevitable that even with a slow or fall in economic growth, the sector continues to expand.</p>
<p>I am not even offering you anecdotal evidence. Research published by <a href="https://jefferies.bluematrix.com/docs/pdf/66904.pdf" target="_blank">Jeffries and Company</a> warns tough economic times are causing marketers to reconsider their online marketing budgets.</p>
<p>However, it suggests marketers are not looking to reduce their budgets but to ensure their money works as hard as possible.</p>
<p>&#8220;More and more advertisers are allocating a greater level of their budgets to more performance-oriented channels, particularly search, and away from brand building formats such as display and sponsorships,&#8221; the report states.</p>
<p>As budgets falter, many marketers are under pressure to justify both their spending and their <em>jobs</em> to employers, and a search marketing campaign could be the way to do that.</p>
<p>Jeffries argues search works because it is performance-based, offers clear returns and those returns are excellent.</p>
<p>In a difficult economic period, companies cannot simply bury their heads and wait for it all to go away, there has to be some marketing activity to keep them in the minds of their customers.</p>
<p>With effective search marketing, a firm can carefully control the amount it spends and generate business despite the slump.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/search-not-squeezed-by-global-slump.html">Search not squeezed by global slump</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/search-not-squeezed-by-global-slump.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEOptimise Continues to Grow with Two New Staff Members</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/seoptimise-continues-to-grow-with-two-new-staff-members.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/seoptimise-continues-to-grow-with-two-new-staff-members.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Barrass</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seoptimise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi I’m Kelly Barrass and have just joined SEOptimise as a Marketing Assistant. I am an undergraduate at Oxford Brookes University, studying Marketing Management and English Literature.  I have previous Marketing Experience for an award winning business in Surrey, and am keen to extend my knowledge and awareness of Search Engine Optimisation.
What Being a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I’m Kelly Barrass and have just joined SEOptimise as a Marketing Assistant. I am an undergraduate at Oxford Brookes University, studying Marketing Management and English Literature.  I have previous Marketing Experience for an award winning business in Surrey, and am keen to extend my knowledge and awareness of Search Engine Optimisation.</p>
<p><strong>What Being a part of SEOptimise means to me</strong></p>
<p>As I get ever more familiar with Marketing as a concept, it is with great excitement that I am part of  such a highly acclaimed organisation as SEOptimise. I am really starting to understand the immense power of the internet as a marketing tool and it is fascinating to see the results of Search Engine Marketing and its potential impact on the growth of businesses through its activities. I am extremely enthusiastic to have an input into this vast online industry and appreciate what an fantastic opportunity I have to be working for SEOptimise.  I’ve only been here 2 weeks and I can see exactly why SEOptimise is the most respected search engine marketing agency in Oxfordshire and it is their expertise and innovation that is inevitably continuing to drive the company forward.</p>
<p><strong> I’m not the only new recruit!</strong></p>
<p>Further indication of SEOptimise’s heightened ambition to grow is the recent recruitment of Search Marketing Executive, <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/author/richard">Richard Fergie</a>.</p>
<p>You may have read ‘Top 10 Resources to Pass the Google AdWords Exam in a Week’, Richard’s brilliant yet rather modest blog post, following his speedy pass of the highly acclaimed professional exam (someone not shy to exams Richard is a Mathematics Graduate of Christ Church College, Oxford!)  Richard not only excels professionally and academically, but is also a keen sportsman, as his position as reserve rower for the Isis Boat suggests. As a further addition to SEOptimise’s host of first-class expertise Richards says himself “It is clear that SEOptimise have built up a successful best practice and ethical <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">search marketing agency</a>. I am looking forward to channelling my skills further and working to create leaders in the online marketplace.”</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/seoptimise-continues-to-grow-with-two-new-staff-members.html">SEOptimise Continues to Grow with Two New Staff Members</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/seoptimise-continues-to-grow-with-two-new-staff-members.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Advertisers Quick to Bid on &#8220;XL Airways&#8221; &#038; &#8220;Lehman Brothers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/adwords-advertisers-quick-to-bid-on-xl-airways-lehman-brothers.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/adwords-advertisers-quick-to-bid-on-xl-airways-lehman-brothers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Gibbons</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[google adwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following XL Airways going into administration last week and yesterday&#8217;s announcement that Lehman Brothers are filing for bankruptcy, many competitors have quickly setup PPC ads targeting brand queries to take advantage of this.
Below are the ads appearing on Google for XL and ads have quickly started appearing today for Lehman Brothers as well:

This obviously wouldn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7612120.stm">XL Airways going into administration</a> last week and yesterday&#8217;s announcement that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7615931.stm">Lehman Brothers are filing for bankruptcy</a>, many competitors have quickly setup PPC ads targeting brand queries to take advantage of this.</p>
<p>Below are the ads appearing on Google for <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=xl">XL</a> and ads have quickly started appearing today for <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=lehman+brothers">Lehman Brothers</a> as well:<br />
<img src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/xl.jpg" /><img src="http://www.seoptimise.com/images/lehman-brothers.jpg" /></p>
<p>This obviously wouldn&#8217;t have been possible before Google opened up <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/04/how-to-protect-your-brand-from-the-google-uk-trademark-change.html">brand bidding</a>, but is this a good thing? Personally I&#8217;m quite impressed with how quickly competitors have acted and surely for people searching for alternative flights to XL this has to be useful.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/adwords-advertisers-quick-to-bid-on-xl-airways-lehman-brothers.html">Google Advertisers Quick to Bid on &#8220;XL Airways&#8221; &#038; &#8220;Lehman Brothers&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/adwords-advertisers-quick-to-bid-on-xl-airways-lehman-brothers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search from the horses&#8217; mouths</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/search-from-the-horses-mouths.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/search-from-the-horses-mouths.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Tofts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I encourage potential search engine optimisation (SEO) clients to read up on the sector through the internet. I want firms to understand the role of our service so they can appreciate the benefits resulting from it.
However, there is a vast amount of information, opinion and sometimes startling-opposed conjecture scattered across the web and for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage potential search engine optimisation (SEO) clients to read up on the sector through the internet. I want firms to understand the role of our service so they can appreciate the benefits resulting from it.</p>
<p>However, there is a vast amount of information, opinion and sometimes startling-opposed conjecture scattered across the web and for a newbie, it can be pretty difficult to figure out what is sense and what is silly - or even potentially damaging.</p>
<p>If you are considering investing in search engine promotions to boost your businesses online, here are two good articles straight from the search engine&#8217;s mouths, covering both SEO and search engine marketing.</p>
<p>Google: Ethical SEO can benefit a website</p>
<p>Google <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35291" target="_blank">recently admitted</a> cautious approval of SEO agencies. It warned webmasters to be careful what company they use to avoid being penalised because of cowboy tactics – a sentiment I agree with wholeheartedly.</p>
<p>Yahoo!: Use Common Sense for Search Marketing</p>
<p>I like Yahoo!&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2008/09/09/don%e2%80%99t-you-dare/" target="_blank">search marketing blog</a>, it always offers very simple but useful commentary for new starters. This recent post holds nothing groundbreaking for those already working in the sector but is an excellent advice source for businesses considering search marketing. From bidding on the right keywords to filling pages with acceptable content, the blog outlines some basic search marketing tenets.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/search-from-the-horses-mouths.html">Search from the horses&#8217; mouths</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/search-from-the-horses-mouths.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>25 Outdated SEO Terms &#38; Tactics vs Their Modern Alternatives</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/25-outdated-seo-terms-tactics-vs-their-modern-alternatives.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/25-outdated-seo-terms-tactics-vs-their-modern-alternatives.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[directories]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many webmasters and website owners fail to notice the fundamental changes the web has taken in recent years. People still waste time with meta keywords tags, obsessing about PageRank and measuring keyword density for highly artificial sounding page copy.
Get real, most of the old school website optimization tactics are completely useless, sometimes even harming your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Many webmasters and website owners fail to notice the fundamental changes the web has taken in recent years. <strong>People still waste time with meta keywords tags, obsessing about PageRank and measuring keyword density</strong> for highly artificial sounding page copy.</div>
<div><em>Get real</em>, most of the old school website optimization tactics are completely useless, sometimes even harming your website. Many SEO tactics have changed, others have been replaced. Some new methods have sprung up in places where obsolete ways of tweaking websites or building links have left a void.</div>
<blockquote>
<div>Some terms are even meaningless by now so that you have to change your mindset completely.</div>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>keyword density/stuffing - killer content creation</strong><br />
Back in the days the more you mentioned a keyword (keyword density) the better you performed in the search results. It was long ago. For years it&#8217;s the other way around. You create highly contentious and linkable killer content to get popular with users and the links push you in the search results, even if your keyword is mentioned just a few times.</p>
<p><strong>PageRank optimization - authority links</strong><br />
Some people really say &#8220;PageRank optimization&#8221;. PageRank optimization is like Pen** enlargement. Bigger does not mean better performance. Recommendations by respectable websites still count but the simple fact that you are linked there often is worth more that the PageRank that gets passed.</p>
<p><strong>metatag optimization - tagging/folksonomy</strong><br />
Like in the above example this is a term that was always disproportionally focusing on one aspect. This aspect is nowadays almost meaningless. The meta keywords tag can be dropped altogether. If you want to add keywords to your page, try tags or even better folksonomy (tagging by many people collectively) to enrich your content in the visible content area.</p>
<p><strong>SEO copywriting for spiders - <a id="yc" title="SEO copywriting for users" href="../2008/07/10-most-basic-seo-copywriting-rules.html">SEO copywriting for users</a> </strong><br />
Are you interested in “SEO Services SEO Company India Search Engine Optimization (SEO) India”? Probably not, that&#8217;s why you are reading a &#8220;SEO blog&#8221; offering &#8220;Internet Marketing News&#8221; from the &#8220;UK&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong> article marketing - <a id="-0" title="business blogging" href="../2008/05/the-simplest-roi-of-blogging-in-seo-link-building.html">business blogging</a> </strong><br />
Article marketing was big when it was important to get many links from different websites and IPs. Duplicate content issues, low quality and other disadvantages made it less of an viable option. At the same time business blogging has really taken shape. It works far better for generating links than article marketing. Of course it&#8217;s a lot more reputable.</p>
<p><strong>search engine submission - xml sitemaps, pinging</strong><br />
It&#8217;s amazing how some services still offer search engine submission (to hundreds of search engines sometimes). While in most countries Google is basically a monopoly, rarely more than 5 search engines matter at all. Three of them enable you to use XML sitemaps to &#8220;submit&#8221;. While this is a viable way of submitting to search engines, it&#8217;s still better to ping Google at it&#8217;s BlogSearch with a blog post instead to get instantly indexed.</p>
<p><strong>checking rankings - <a id="vfb-" title="checking 33 other metrics" href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/08/33-website-success-metrics-instead-of-rankings-google-pagerank-and-traffic.html">checking 33 other metrics</a> </strong><br />
Some people obsess about ranking as much as about PageRank (some even mix up both terms). Rankings differ though depending on the place you search from and your personal search history among others. So in short two people in most cases won&#8217;t see the same search results. You should consider measuring some of these above linked 33 website success metrics instead.</p>
<p><strong>reciprocal linking - linking out</strong><br />
No, the modern version of reciprocal linking are not three way links schemes or something. As long as the link swapping works artificially on the premise of barter it&#8217;s outdated. It takes much more time and effort to attempt to find suitable link partners than just linking out to the blogs in your niche you favor. While not everybody will link back some will if your content is a king and not just a peasant. Some people even will link you even more than you linked them in many instances. These links will be perfectly natural too so they will count more than artificial exchanged links.</p>
<p><strong>paid links/text link ads - sponsoring, charity</strong><br />
Some people just can&#8217;t get sex for free. It&#8217;s the same with webmasters. They want it now without the hassle, they still want to pay. Link love that is paid seldom works out in the long run, but there are ways to get valid links with a monetary investment. It&#8217;s indirect though. Sponsoring and charity done right will be great for both the artists, activist or non-profits receiving the funds and the company supporting them financially.</p>
<p><strong>forum signature - homepage link on active social media profiles</strong><br />
Many people still use forums, especially forums that allow signatures that &#8220;pass PageRank&#8221;. Sometimes the signature is longer than the forum post itself and Google has taken this &#8220;SEO tactic&#8221; into account years ago. On the other hand there are lots of social media sites who let you add a link to your homepage in the profile. When you are contributing consistently to these your profile page gains more and more authority, also for Google.</p>
<p><strong>footer links - content links</strong><br />
Just a few years ago people used to stuff their page footers with useless links to their link exchange partners. Bad news if you still do that: Google discounts those in most cases. What you need are content links. So make people write about you in their blogs by providing exceptional resources, up to the minute news or a unique analysis and opinion not repeating what everybody else said.</p>
<p><strong>blog comments - trackbacks (comments on your blog)</strong><br />
Many people still comment on &#8220;dofollow blogs&#8221; as one of their major &#8220;link building&#8221; tactics. These links still might pass some Google juice but for how long and how much? It&#8217;s much better to write in your own blog about others bloggers or link and trackback them to get a response, a link back to your site or blog.</p>
<p><strong>anchor text - topical pages/paragraphs</strong><br />
When people realized that you can rank higher if your link anchor text e.g. is &lt;link&gt;SEO blog&lt;/link&gt; for a SEO blog they started to &#8220;build links&#8221; with the same anchor text over and over. Normal users don&#8217;t link with relevant anchor text, let alone the same anchor text everywhere. So soon Google adapted by discounting anchor text that is obviously SEOed. Moreover ever since Adsense appeared years ago, Google has been able to determine what&#8217;s around an element or on your page in the first place. So your &#8220;SEO blog&#8221; anchor text doesn&#8217;t matter much if the page is about dating.</p>
<p><strong>noscript tag links - no flash or ajax versions</strong><br />
Webmasters discovered the noscript tag to insert lots of invisible links in pages that look legitmate to search engines. Unfortunately they do not for a few years now. You should provide an alternative version for non-flash or non-AJAX users though if you have a fancy menu for instance. Load the Flash or AJAX-free menu for those who have switched of scripts or haven&#8217;t Flash installed. These links are also useful for search bots.</p>
<p><strong>hidden counter links - widgets with &#8220;more&#8221; links</strong><br />
Some free counter services still force you to add not only invisible links to the counter homepage but to completely irrelevant third party sites. Of course this is crap nowadays and won&#8217;t last. One user who reports it to Google suffices. In Web 2.0 times and beyond there appeared lots of widgets for blogs and websites though that use such a method in a legitimate way. They offer basic info in a widget and add some more of it after clicking a link.</p>
<p><strong>WordPress themes links - Firefox Add ons</strong><br />
For a while footer links in WordPress themes made WordPress theme designers the most popular web personalities on the Web. This problem of blown up link popularity has been discovered and dealt with in 2007 so you won&#8217;t get a &#8220;PageRank 7&#8243; just by designing or porting a few themes. What&#8217;s still very popular though are Firefox extensions. Millions of people use Firefox and add ons. As most Firefox users are quite web-savvy they feature their favorite add ons on their blogs so that you get plenty of authority links once you write a popular extension.</p>
<p><strong>too many directory links - generating buzz</strong><br />
While directory submission to a few directories (like a 12) still makes sense to get a site indexed in Google via the directory links it does not make sense to submit to hundreds of directories as these are often low value. Create a buzz around your site by viral videos or even good old press releases to get for link power.</p>
<p><strong>HTML 3.2 - XHTML 1+</strong><br />
for a long time SEO experts advised to use the simplest HTML possible for Google, HTML 3.2 for instance. Sites designed in  in this archaic HTML version looked accordingly. While the simplicity argument is still valid I made the best experiences with XHTML 1+ strict. It limits the code size naturally and you end up with being simple to crawl for Google and other bots.</p>
<p><strong>guaranteed positions -  ROI and conversions</strong><br />
Some SEO firms still proclaim to offer &#8220;guaranteed top positions&#8221; in Google, while in itself a misleading claim it does not make sense anymore to rely on rankings as these differ from place to place and computer to computer. Focus on ROI and conversions instead. If you like to guarantee a ROI of 200% or a 10% conversion rate it does make much more sense on the business level.</p>
<p><strong>link building - getting links</strong><br />
The concept of link building has an underlying assumption of links that are artificially &#8220;build&#8221;. Otherwise it would be called &#8220;getting links&#8221; or something else, but building implies an active involvement of the SEO and actual manual inserting links somewhere. In contrast link baiting and other more common methods nowadays rely on other means than sheer &#8220;building&#8221; to get links in a natural, organic way. Built links will always be subject to the search engine&#8217;s quality team&#8217;s scrutiny. Completely organic links can&#8217;t be filtered out obviously.</p>
<p><strong>PageRank Sculpting - Making every page matter and useful</strong><br />
This one seems to be an accepted practice of many in the SEO industry while, others, whom I support, advise against it. PageRank sculpting means that some pages on a website are linked by nofollowed internal links to ensure that other, more important pages get more Google juice. While this seemingly makes sense, most people overdo it and in some cases even whole sites get nofollowed by accident. Recently I encountered several sites that were completely made non-indexable for search engines via noindex/nofollow for no reason. Many webmasters will for instance nofollow the contact page in order not to make it the most important page in Google (as it&#8217;s linked from everywhere). In fact in many cases it is though, people are searching just for your address or a company nearby, especially via iPhone or other mobile phones.</p>
<p><strong>forums - communities</strong><br />
Do you consider adding a forum to your site? Well, think twice. Forums are problem oriented (people go to forums to solve a problem) and people using them are often aggressive. Social communities on the other hand add a far more positive enhancement to a site. Adding content is based on popularity and thus good content is submitted. Sphinn is the best example for that in spite of the fact that recently some try to superimpose their condescending and aggressive behavior on the community. It seems that with growing popularity you also face these problems with communities but it&#8217;s not a wide spread inherent problem like with forums.</p>
<p><strong>outstanding frontpage design - landing pages, usable check out forms</strong><br />
Not a cool homepage counts, or at least not solely, but clean and focused landing pages as well as working and usable check out forms for visitors to complete a purchase.</p>
<p><strong>cluttered portal like pages - white space and focused pages with no distractions</strong><br />
Do you remember portals? Google made them obsolete but amazingly enough some commercial sites still try to imitate the portals of the late nineties. These sites work by overwhelming the visitor with information overflow. The logic behind that is that the user will get stuck somewhere, find something out of the hundreds of links to click. This doesn&#8217;t work though. People bounce off the site and search for another one less cramped. You need to offer white space for strained eyes to rest and focused pages no distractions that offer exactly what the visitors wants one keyword per page.<br />
<strong>DMOZ - Delicious Popular</strong><br />
Some people submitted their pages to DMOZ directory to get an authority link and they still are waiting after 2 years or more. DMOZ is an epic failure of an elitist directory system. Instead try to <a id="wq57" title="get on the Delicious homepage" href="/2008/07/78-essential-search-engine-marketing-seo-resources.html">get on the Delicious homepage</a>, here you get many more valuable links. Delicious killed the DMOZ star.</p>
<p>While on most of the above mentioned issues most experts will agree, some of them are debatable but nonetheless you have to face them and decide whether you keep with the old ways or adapt to new web environment.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/25-outdated-seo-terms-tactics-vs-their-modern-alternatives.html">25 Outdated SEO Terms &amp; Tactics vs Their Modern Alternatives</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/25-outdated-seo-terms-tactics-vs-their-modern-alternatives.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google: Guardian of knowledge or danger to freedom?</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/google-guardian-of-knowledge-or-danger-to-freedom.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/google-guardian-of-knowledge-or-danger-to-freedom.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Tofts</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s recent tenth birthday has left me (and pretty much everyone with an opinion on search) pondering the extent of its power. In its short commercial life the engine has changed from quirky student project to a multi-billion pound business. It has spawned language developments, helped create the sector in which I work and inserted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s recent tenth birthday has left me (and pretty much everyone with an opinion on search) pondering the extent of its power. In its short commercial life the engine has changed from quirky student project to a multi-billion pound business. It has spawned language developments, helped create the sector in which I work and inserted fingers into a startling number of pies – admittedly never quite replicating the success of its search facility.</p>
<p>So just how much power has it drawn to itself? Some people now access the web through their Google browser and check their GoogleMail before catching up with friends on GoogleTalk and maybe browsing YouTube (a Google property). The majority of web users in Britain frequently use the search engine to navigate the web, according to several studies.</p>
<p>If the internet is an extension of the world, Google is one of the top demigods. It can even punish sinners, throwing websites out of the top results if firms transgress its definition of acceptable search engine optimisation.</p>
<p>Many of us rely hugely on Google, to the exclusion of other, similar services. If I want to read a newspaper I don&#8217;t <em>buy</em> one, I visit Google News. If it were to suddenly prioritise right-wing news over the left, many people would fail to notice, at least for a while. Certainly a large number of my friends who give no thought the how exactly it picks the results it presents would probably not notice a political slant to the information they were presented with.</p>
<p>Now Google is <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/bringing-history-online-one-newspaper.html" target="_blank">putting 200 years-worth of newspapers online</a> – a fantastic development which will fascinate people and facilitate research. This can only help further knowledge and yet it is one more tool we are likely to start relying on and which Google will control.</p>
<p>These thoughts are not unique and I am certainly not the first commentator to address them. I am also not proposing we do anything about it – the only thing more worrying to me than a commercial entity with all this power is a specific government in charge.</p>
<p>Google has not really abused its power so far. However, it is now a long way from the young firm sticking it to Microsoft. <a href="http://investor.google.com/conduct.html" target="_blank">Don&#8217;t be evil</a>, Google, you are much too big.</p>
<p>Copyright SEOptimise. Original article from our <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/">SEO Blog</a> - <a href="http://www.seoptimise.com">Search Engine Marketing Services</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/google-guardian-of-knowledge-or-danger-to-freedom.html">Google: Guardian of knowledge or danger to freedom?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/google-guardian-of-knowledge-or-danger-to-freedom.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Resources to Pass the Google AdWords Exam in a Week</title>
		<link>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/top-10-resources-to-pass-the-google-adwords-exam-in-a-week.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2008/09/top-10-resources-to-pass-the-google-adwords-exam-in-a-week.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fergie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[google adwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/?p=897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I’m Richard Fergie, the newest guy at SEOptimise. I’ve been with the company a week now and I’ve just taken (and passed) the Google AdWords exam. I’ve been asked to do a blog post about it so (in the best SEO blog tradition) I decided on doing a top 10 list of things I’ve found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span style="Calibri;">Hi, I’m Richard Fergie, the newest guy at SEOptimise. I’ve been with the company a week now and I’ve just taken (and passed) the Google AdWords exam. I’ve been asked to do a blog post about it so (in the best SEO blog tradition) I decided on doing a top 10 list of things I’ve found useful. Here goes… </span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="l0 level1 lfo1;"><span style="minor-latin;"><span style="Ignore;"><span style="Calibri;">1.</span><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><span style="small;"><span style="Calibri;"><strong>The Official Resource</strong><br />
</span></span><a href="http://www.google.com/adwords/learningcenter/"><span style="Calibri;">The AdWords Learning Centre</span></a><span style="Calibri;">. If you are a visual or aural learner head straight for the multimedia lessons. If you’re in a hurry, need a quick reference or learn best by reading there are also </span><a href="http://www.google.com/adwords/learningcenter/text/index.html"><span style="Calibri;">text lessons</span></a><span style="small;"><span style="Calibri;">. The AdWords learning centre is Google’s own training tool for AdWords so I’d say it is the best resource for presenting information on all of Google’s ad policies in a clear and concise way.<br />
The Learning Centre breaks its course down into short sections (the longest unit is supposed to take 15 minutes) so it is easy to just do a bit at a time and there are also handy quizzes on each subsection.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="l0 level1 lfo1;"><span style="minor-latin;"><span style="Ignore;"><span style="Calibri;">2.</span><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"> </span></span></span><span style="small;"><span style="Calibri;"><strong>